From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A1F11E00C1E; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:19:06 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (diego.sueiro[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.217.180 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com (mail-lb0-f180.google.com [209.85.217.180]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EABE00BEE for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:19:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id x4so76703421lbm.0 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 06:19:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=HHfZwZhtej3SgEWkLzyD3Y16AksJcHoCTWypNJyGO0c=; b=rBTEz4LisHXj7Sy07vhDYlOZQmNK8tXiztl1hoFuaWpDJHq3Cz1XCOq7gQbue9K1lY 85AzWBgRvz9lBxIR1QTYwondo8BPcAeNor2z4bjsz7DMMIYk6yE2e62JQ7U+4Wl8Jc4+ NWgUFRcc6FCr8qjasLZ/UJdzaQiJElFebUJjXX89vdNrjXBBvKT+2hwutpepNZ5fkboS 5w3hwEJSjoN82S73o9nisnubtPLk3eS84EFbaseo5LsNQ9ZJZ/U8ZEKqLCkj3OzNXF5M hKWKRHXM6K7Nge6a/5YGEXhCeNOXOtPJvfVkJ7d2yKqIFvDRBomlzQ1DhA2cTaKJ3cqW aEIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=HHfZwZhtej3SgEWkLzyD3Y16AksJcHoCTWypNJyGO0c=; b=VGyqMX6n6uQJZT1ms9lERm1c7FcXit7qJDwcrib4eKLZSmXjaK+ObWZ5aeb8VmXL+N CBbXOyOc49Zo0now4EcB7Y9bGlW4OLGP7NTeQ8ClAVeX4lwmCIxM0aBFacq7adgx7K+a 7OjSM/cwp6Zw+4AwyGdaJNd+/NJ+GsGtSMM4PdCLUaouKiVVuoCVtb7hSvEU3qQmzHWp 6NFK16doimynp24Gjc+o1ZqIfeQSWaM3m51n/Jd26zLOgIbJfQoKk+jA3stUnZrHpNt7 mGCjkuiXZi1Jacw0B5TScRhOn94ZzE+LxPKWaoQyQm+2t9/q9gA9z16H9AOvPTbW6t06 groQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSO81gUQpJll8Ebeus2c8d6YAaDTgjd5n42XfEc4qRTBcNMO74zmLQIdMoUC3WNfBfkCgQrNJD1ePoEbg== X-Received: by 10.112.160.232 with SMTP id xn8mr7187285lbb.22.1454336340635; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 06:19:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.171.168 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:18:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Diego Sueiro Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:18:41 +0000 Message-ID: To: Bryan Evenson Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Migrate, or not Migrate, that's the question!!! X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:19:06 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c38e50f7b895052ab6101b --001a11c38e50f7b895052ab6101b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Bryan, On 28 January 2016 at 13:49, Bryan Evenson wrote: > In my opinion, I think in the long term it would be easier to make a clean > break. Start with a recent branch, like Jethro, get a minimal image to > build for your hardware and then add your own layer with your proprietary > recipes. I think that will be a lot easier than trying to get oe-core > working with 5+ year old versions of gcc and eglibc. Yes, that would mean > additional testing, but it may be less testing/integration than you are > currently doing just trying to keep your current image maintained. > > > Thanks for your opinion. But unfortunately, updating the packages is out of scope in this moment since the product is certificated and doing this will require a new process. Maybe I can use the Arago External Pre-built Binary Toolchain (2011-09)[1] in which is supported by TI until daisy branch[2]. [1] - http://software-dl.ti.com/sdoemb/sdoemb_public_sw/arago_toolchain/2011_09/index_FDS.html [2] - http://arago-project.org/git/?p=meta-arago.git;a=tree;f=meta-arago-extras/conf/distro/include;h=23e7bcba85ab80e4bf813fd43f64c61a12ba3f0a;hb=refs/heads/daisy Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro Administrador do Embarcados www.embarcados.com.br /*long live rock 'n roll*/ --001a11c38e50f7b895052ab6101b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bryan,


On 28 January 2016 at 13:49, Bryan Evenson <bevenson@melinkcorp.c= om> wrote:

In my opinion, I think in the long term it would be easier to make a clean= break.=C2=A0 Start with a recent branch, like Jethro, get a minimal image = to build for your hardware and then add your own layer with your proprietary recipes.=C2=A0 = I think that will be a lot easier than trying to get oe-core working with 5= + year old versions of gcc and eglibc.=C2=A0 Yes, that would mean additiona= l testing, but it may be less testing/integration than you are currently doing just trying to keep your current image mainta= ined.

=C2=A0

<= br>Thanks for your opinion.

But unfortunately, updating the packages is out of sc= ope in this moment since the product is certificated and doing this will re= quire a new process.

Maybe I can use the Arago External Pre-built Binary Toolch= ain (2011-09)[1] in which is supported by TI until daisy branch[2].


[1] -=C2=A0http://softwar= e-dl.ti.com/sdoemb/sdoemb_public_sw/arago_toolchain/2011_09/index_FDS.html<= /a>
[2] -=C2=A0http://arago-project.org/git/?p=3Dmeta-arago.git;a=3Dtree;f=3Dmeta-arago-e= xtras/conf/distro/include;h=3D23e7bcba85ab80e4bf813fd43f64c61a12ba3f0a;hb= =3Drefs/heads/daisy


Regards,

--
*dS
D= iego Sueiro

Administrador do Embarcados
www.embarcados.= com.br

/*long live rock 'n roll*/
--001a11c38e50f7b895052ab6101b--