From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90200C433F5 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 02:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229901AbiDUCac (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 22:30:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35344 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243732AbiDUCac (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 22:30:32 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93DE62BF0; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id y20so7142853eju.7; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:27:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R3JuWxV3MEVv1Lzcod+dHK0KjwdRCKAyPORx4Cnws3Y=; b=YmffCP0vsltafj0PR01HbipYBVztaVFa0dkqW7KzyhMrRRZxn2+UgbgF09l4C6DG23 vD1E1GS210baqKsSLGQwPTwuPYitinUMRBogRf9EmVi+W43AvkGk3/rm5LcVzcq5/QEi 8po1wsvLj9nhjnsezpZSW8DJ1RshRr0KZJU1lKWWM9Y4fqvrDXcaWM2ZIT8qXjee6fpa D89RRkitKmLFtBM4mOdfjBpYJGZddh6I8LsIDSSeYATKCoHhRxwjbTPz1QiP4pPPOIkB +vyBYuDxWdyjksxd9xfaymviHVxjhTWDFI2V54VKG1+Xr0igYxDj08KGEsyDWYCMAk4Z nM9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R3JuWxV3MEVv1Lzcod+dHK0KjwdRCKAyPORx4Cnws3Y=; b=bdQwMgnaGdNgLmgACqYA1a8lxkzynKq2MqL6A7hUozzTdI3j/rtbqmdc1j/yiRFzMf 7p5a4xof7DffkZ2xeoZEUe3sumhP5ACdOTLtc8+K1kEF2UyEMdCLNXP+v4eLOsJaCMPF PPEhD6YVeSmJBr0s0BrtUB3KbyxIH744Y6Vb9Y0K8P1zuDaNQV07hLaVPHy031uOnesj EScyk3dPSTS/C98Oghggt8ATszXJpx6gN2ApubRJE6HkKarCk6UH0fEZwb2PvzDrYfTI 9mdsfjEcSJ4NzO5gXUlWsNKTJYgUELkwIecLgnnVVQ9MAoWY6i39FaRGT76Uof00qSzF SdMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BPRO2MxhWYUTEwUvuW5RjLGUzXkwyMsjOTki978WtL/1Krrtt YM4sIsSFSr2aDJaM7vbc/x9B2uBkfgRCINUb2CU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvipLBGmLxZpw6NAUSz1qUACyI4Q9SC2Vznyp+9pzjd8/bGlMlbItSS3SvX1Vk9pIjqmwcQsaLXR3ZvRFGZ3M= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7204:b0:6e8:c1e9:49f7 with SMTP id dr4-20020a170907720400b006e8c1e949f7mr20948912ejc.251.1650508062095; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:27:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220420122307.5290-1-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> <878rrzj4r6.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <878rrzj4r6.fsf@toke.dk> From: Tonghao Zhang Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:27:05 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [net-next v1] bpf: add bpf_ktime_get_real_ns helper To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Jiri Olsa , Dave Marchevsky , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Joanne Koong , Geliang Tang , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 8:53 PM Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > > xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com writes: > > > From: Tonghao Zhang > > > > This patch introduce a new bpf_ktime_get_real_ns helper, which may > > help us to measure the skb latency in the ingress/forwarding path: > > > > HW/SW[1] -> ip_rcv/tcp_rcv_established -> tcp_recvmsg_locked/tcp_update= _recv_tstamps > > > > * Insert BPF kprobe into ip_rcv/tcp_rcv_established invoking this helpe= r. > > Then we can inspect how long time elapsed since HW/SW. > > * If inserting BPF kprobe tcp_update_recv_tstamps invoked by tcp_recvms= g, > > we can measure how much latency skb in tcp receive queue. The reason = for > > this can be application fetch the TCP messages too late. > > Why not just use one of the existing ktime helpers and also add a BPF > probe to set the initial timestamp instead of relying on skb->tstamp? Yes, That also looks good to me. > -Toke --=20 Best regards, Tonghao