Re: [PATCH 4/5] bios-tables-test: add test for number of cores > 255

[Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 5:20 PM Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 May 2022 18:56:50 +0200
> Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > The new test is run with a large number of cpus and checks if the
> > core_count field in smbios_cpu_test (structure type 4) is correct.
> >
> > Choose q35 as it allows to run with -smp > 255.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> > index 0ba9d749a5..f2464adaa0 100644
> > --- a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> > +++ b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> > @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ typedef struct {
> >      smbios_entry_point smbios_ep_table;
> >      uint16_t smbios_cpu_max_speed;
> >      uint16_t smbios_cpu_curr_speed;
> > +    uint8_t smbios_core_count;
> > +    uint16_t smbios_core_count2;
> >      uint8_t *required_struct_types;
> >      int required_struct_types_len;
> >      QTestState *qts;
> > @@ -640,8 +642,9 @@ static inline bool smbios_single_instance(uint8_t type)
> >
> >  static bool smbios_cpu_test(test_data *data, uint32_t addr)
> >  {
> > +    uint8_t real_cc, expect_cc = data->smbios_core_count;
>
> %s/expect/expected/
> also I'd s/real_cc/core_count/
>
> > +    uint16_t real, real_cc2, expect_cc2 = data->smbios_core_count2;
> ditto
>
> >      uint16_t expect_speed[2];
> > -    uint16_t real;
> >      int offset[2];
> >      int i;
> >
> > @@ -660,6 +663,20 @@ static bool smbios_cpu_test(test_data *data, uint32_t addr)
> >          }
> >      }
> >
> > +    real_cc = qtest_readb(data->qts, addr + offsetof(struct smbios_type_4, core_count));
> > +    real_cc2 = qtest_readw(data->qts, addr + offsetof(struct smbios_type_4, core_count2));
> > +
> > +    if (expect_cc && (real_cc != expect_cc)) {
> > +        fprintf(stderr, "Unexpected SMBIOS CPU count: real %u expect %u\n",
> > +                real_cc, expect_cc);
> > +        return false;
>
> since you are rewriting it anyways, how about
> if (expect_cc) {
>   g_assert_cmpuint(...)
> }
>
> instead of printing/propagating error

That works. But I still need to return something, unless you want to
change the original code too.

Best regards, Julia Suvorova.

> > +    }
> > +    if ((expect_cc == 0xFF) && (real_cc2 != expect_cc2)) {
> > +        fprintf(stderr, "Unexpected SMBIOS CPU count2: real %u expect %u\n",
> > +                real_cc2, expect_cc2);
> > +        return false;
> > +    }
> > +
> >      return true;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -905,6 +922,21 @@ static void test_acpi_q35_tcg(void)
> >      free_test_data(&data);
> >  }
> >
> > +static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_core_count2(void)
> > +{
> > +    test_data data = {
> > +        .machine = MACHINE_Q35,
> > +        .variant = ".core-count2",
> > +        .required_struct_types = base_required_struct_types,
> > +        .required_struct_types_len = ARRAY_SIZE(base_required_struct_types),
> > +        .smbios_core_count = 0xFF,
> > +        .smbios_core_count2 = 275,
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    test_acpi_one("-machine smbios-entry-point-type=64 -smp 275", &data);
> > +    free_test_data(&data);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_bridge(void)
> >  {
> >      test_data data;
> > @@ -1787,6 +1819,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >          qtest_add_func("acpi/piix4/pci-hotplug/off",
> >                         test_acpi_piix4_no_acpi_pci_hotplug);
> >          qtest_add_func("acpi/q35", test_acpi_q35_tcg);
> > +        qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/core-count2", test_acpi_q35_tcg_core_count2);
> >          qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/bridge", test_acpi_q35_tcg_bridge);
> >          qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/multif-bridge", test_acpi_q35_multif_bridge);
> >          qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/mmio64", test_acpi_q35_tcg_mmio64);
>