From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4D7C33CAD for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B8D2081E for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloud.ionos.com header.i=@cloud.ionos.com header.b="Hs40/hCt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727289AbgAMLXg (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 06:23:36 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:39197 "EHLO mail-io1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725992AbgAMLXg (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 06:23:36 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id c16so9369463ioh.6 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 03:23:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloud.ionos.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U4v91slysBtu2+ZNUNp733HGyuTdWdB0vCTPvzlAMaQ=; b=Hs40/hCtDaw8kIdqbXXKtTxZGwlkdcXPIDSr52sBt9lKZdJOA8HTIs1ZJ6HDFBBSPi VQ29OLELQpXHhFZ7d3W2i8YPFQNotSpRMRfktWCTtklFthmuOj+HiqKwvTFybvX7EeIU 17M7lpOhht4JNwwXL8Syph5dMdt6WeUH641P95PEbNJy/TD1t2gXTe4Xm25TRe8Ai5T+ y2kJPxuaHzZcBDfLYg8Gxrel4rToqKqV/alyquGkWsJr7CX0alX/MGe/xyLb08aRIsGr 2cSxy/i7JUBgY8X5p9Qq+yLCv44Pg+emYzgR/Ou2ozfELUGO36BSInuQuZfWtRTceGnm alHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U4v91slysBtu2+ZNUNp733HGyuTdWdB0vCTPvzlAMaQ=; b=qtxw5irO0gSMgQyfJk8gWLTdawDu7n9F5BqT0WNShQBMxe3dcnjuiud5+SOlShfqm+ K5BiKD1ulQZ7SCMjwoQeZPcRASmOEwVAbS0W5o5oJqQIk8KdWKbFlUgcPe79dAWJDWzY BQQgxyth1qiZcZKYxcpzcvK2/aq0mYLpB2TkyhP5YBCgTt6PEY34o8nk49egaW02m0fb FicfUV9ZrVodAeuaXx2OxXH6lLaYEhjIx6Y+rcM9bhZAN4cYXb+VxivGV8TaI65Bor1z lA4E9T5wzifsymU5RbmP48wdb9eoo9m54lFQKiV4wXOhYTzA/XY6KwLTXpJEV8pUNXWS u9AA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXtFinLUo1ydOFCIIymXtYC1u0k6wOVLrSYT19PgskkxUMAChnz Cs0mSnq0E4cTOay5DMijLkqrGFm1fMqRu29dnpETtQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz3R0cwnpdFNzGF+9v6caVTmnupsODQb8Q35NPNszuiOcxuERTT/1cGd+mLaOMrq7IQY9L3CBVEeb5VduDXGpE= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:c606:: with SMTP id f6mr12207438iok.71.1578914615813; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 03:23:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200109192317.4045173-1-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com> <20200112125055.512b65f6@cakuba> <20200113032030.2fc9d891@cakuba> In-Reply-To: <20200113032030.2fc9d891@cakuba> From: Jinpu Wang Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 12:23:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: Bump up MAX_MSIX from 64 to 128 To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Jonathan Lemon , netdev , tariqt@mellanox.com, "David S. Miller" , kernel-team@fb.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:20 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:47:59 +0100, Jinpu Wang wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:51 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:23:17 -0800, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > > > On modern hardware with a large number of cpus and using XDP, > > > > the current MSIX limit is insufficient. Bump the limit in > > > > order to allow more queues. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon > > > > > > Applied to net-next, thanks everyone! > > > > > > (Jack, please make sure you spell your tags right) > > Checked, It's correct both in my reply and in net-next.git. > > I manually corrected it in tree. You swapped 'i' and 'e' > in the word reviewed, your email had "reveiwed". oh, sorry for that, will be more careful next time. And thanks for the correction.