From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com (mail-ig0-f176.google.com [209.85.213.176]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999187713C for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 5so20024635igt.0 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:36:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Q3r6qL/p2tYAh3JGSawYnHkspeOqEGsqb7/baDWbBVw=; b=sDrfK2LeRyi1YaMY2hTAi6L4r+unokf/yrEayRkhEY5ImEspkqRzaCmnofobWbDs6v j6RAAt8MDIacrOjfsjZd+Tc2S+FwoqovyAbSYJo9t6ssjUbLrtfxcCfP41Z7jz2Gr6pv spF3HRCrohMtcwxoSSbC+9Nle5CMwr5Uvho0copIHxQFr9G2ltGvGz6B4CAQ6d1Gi1qr Iu0KGDGZ6wycOZqKBuW9oYL5MRp6qyvrFjWJv1Ol2nPezTW4RkV+6TNaxggfK0fKZ8S4 O/CuvTrDw6znRafKepCfduu57KRpPH86RUlthjC7ewppmeV6NcfbE67XaJIpFle8yvyd HOzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Q3r6qL/p2tYAh3JGSawYnHkspeOqEGsqb7/baDWbBVw=; b=gmw3sSmSnTGdEdpxuouSlJ8Ea5k/cN+V2sMuRCuzg3JF2LmWMx6MzwH93bfRzAIVJz sONfNAoA9gToO8MITXpyxefBIiW5lp1Wsv/ece5YAQjJHq3BjuED5WcipgydCtRuSyFP afheg2H05Nyj4nnT02AkItO0y+0NMn6751kKZymZ66svKhT8nIWipCcidnCXk55C1Ulx cU3ULlK45/EFylS8APdcJR0+1CLifWbrUCUzM0es9SYAp31ZYVYFhDAX2hJ1JysXUZ4X 2KJ9LQmOkQhmr8CLIKxi6yZASRG1s2xEaDlOKKezyGrhvNkov/+ts38Xxuv6vtBp34An zz6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORQQasfRSM+ndSbs70dEJ54d6qSYkUiDSmJhwLmRGwU9haT+syvNPcoBJIGX/n8W+fdJt6QkWmcc3hxgA== X-Received: by 10.50.79.196 with SMTP id l4mr17426066igx.11.1454697360061; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:36:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.46.219 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:35:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1454697094.27087.280.camel@linuxfoundation.org> References: <1454424587-4251-1-git-send-email-mac@mcrowe.com> <1454428874.27087.87.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <20160202210411.GA20640@mcrowe.com> <1454452885.27087.127.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <20160205173256.GA7728@mcrowe.com> <1454697094.27087.280.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Khem Raj Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:35:30 -0800 Message-ID: To: Richard Purdie Cc: Mike Crowe , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove unhelpful default value of EXTRA_OEMAKE X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:35:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 10:22 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Mike Crowe wrote: >> > On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 14:49 +0000, Mike Crowe wrote: >> > On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 21:04 +0000, Mike Crowe wrote: >> > > > I've compile-tested qemux86 and qemuarm for core-image-sato. >> > > > qemumips >> > > > is building now. >> > >> > Since then I've collected enough patches to make "bitbake world" >> > build >> > successfully for qemux86, qemuarm, qemuppc and qemumips. qemux86-64 >> > is >> > building now. The recipes that needed fixing to explicitly set >> > EXTRA_OEMAKE = "-e MAKEFLAGS=" were: >> > >> > meta/recipes-bsp/apmd/apmd_3.2.2-15.bb >> > meta/recipes-bsp/libacpi/libacpi_0.2.bb >> > meta/recipes-bsp/pciutils/pciutils_3.4.1.bb >> > meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl.inc >> > meta/recipes-devtools/dmidecode/dmidecode_3.0.bb >> > meta/recipes-devtools/fdisk/gptfdisk_1.0.1.bb >> > meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl-native_5.22.1.bb >> > meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.22.1.bb >> > meta/recipes-extended/ed/ed_1.9.bb >> > meta/recipes-extended/iputils/iputils_s20151218.bb >> > meta/recipes-extended/pigz/pigz.inc >> > meta/recipes-extended/stat/stat_3.3.bb >> > meta/recipes-extended/sysklogd/sysklogd.inc >> > meta/recipes-extended/unzip/unzip_6.0.bb >> > meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-theme-torturer/gtk-theme-torturer_git.bb >> > meta/recipes-support/ptest-runner/ptest-runner_2.0.bb >> > >> > I will submit patches for these shortly. >> >> then there are other layers besides OE-Core where this will be >> needed. >> so phase it right so it doesnt cause land slide work for other layers > > How do we do that? > > Obviously I can merge the above into OE-Core and then there is just the > final bitbake.conf patch. How long do we need to wait for other layers > to sort this out though? hard problem, it just makes it longer for adopting a release thats the effect. the only solution is to fix the issues. Or phase in with backward compatibility these kind of stuff can be treated like ABI of OE-Core IMO > > I'm facing this dilemma with a few patches atm... > > Cheers, > > Richard >