On Thursday, December 15, 2011, Joshua Lock wrote: > Additionally I'm not sure where the LGPL license came from, the COPYING > file and Fedora both say GPL v2 or later so drop the LGPL entry for now. > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock > --- > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc | 2 +- > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc > index eac7903..769d54a 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "/dev/ and hotplug management daemon" > DESCRIPTION = "udev is a daemon which dynamically creates and removes device nodes from \ > /dev/, handles hotplug events and loads drivers at boot time." > HOMEPAGE = " http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/udev.html" > -LICENSE = "GPLv2+ & LGPLv2.1+" > +LICENSE = "GPL-2.0+" > LICENSE_${PN} = "GPLv2+ Why two notations for Gpl v2 above > LICENSE_libudev = "LGPLv2.1+" > LICENSE_libgudev = "LGPLv2.1+" > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc > index d731816..2e501fa 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > SUMMARY = "/dev/ and hotplug management daemon" > DESCRIPTION = "udev is a program which dynamically creates and removes device nodes from \ > /dev/. It responds to /sbin/hotplug device events and requires a 2.6 kernel." > -LICENSE = "GPL" > +LICENSE = "GPL-2.0+" > > SRC_URI += " \ > file://udev.rules \ > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ SRC_URI += " \ > file://mount.sh \ > file://network.sh \ > file://local.rules \ > - file://udev-cache \ > + file://udev-cache \ > file://init" > > UDEV_DEVFS_RULES ?= "0" > -- > 1.7.7.4 > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >