From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SINSq-0002ZQ-4q for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:05:44 +0200 Received: by lbky2 with SMTP id y2so1649224lbk.6 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:56:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PbR7KiU2ykmg4chu2MdzS9ohKNFEBrpTJRwNb9QcEio=; b=gYTYHPqgWRqleH2b7vrjl7AyLZWHDVABw7k0xl/yytUP+0AfXWRI9jVr0rK/UPu8gh aQRSauX1LxzMXuTVpGC8Wi6LaXFEUtPZ9teiNiCNiEYnIPS4oMW/AuLnupRnYqMz6Y2N oDKzWtTBx4Ks/Z/OD4SSzovRthwrL4Go81QGGRGb00oxMv8KrK0OoQS/5VV95qvM0n6C Cfuyq62YtnhwJ9C/j4wQ2Ifa1Yc14QPDF9B0olah18Td3jPFXko7btHz74hQV3co3/+N GTh6YhTDnTFS+UHoJSYaPYlYm6haVRkX/6nfxA5M+ZiqQGiS/UyfMiJ65iNfKuuXxfKH WM+w== Received: by 10.152.113.229 with SMTP id jb5mr2787273lab.45.1334249783620; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:56:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.129.134 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:55:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4543FDF1-0512-4B36-ABB3-DBB957B86E88@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <7E680CB2A76BB8438D08CF13C09FC53A46B06325@FMSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com> <4F84D58F.8020608@gmail.com> <1334221321.31685.24.camel@ted> <4543FDF1-0512-4B36-ABB3-DBB957B86E88@dominion.thruhere.net> From: Khem Raj Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:55:53 -0700 Message-ID: To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Cc: Julian Pidancet Subject: Re: Yocto Project 1.2 M4 schedule X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:05:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Koen Kooi wro= te: > > Op 12 apr. 2012, om 11:02 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > >> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 01:51 +0100, Julian Pidancet wrote: >>> On 04/09/12 19:01, Liu, Song wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> This is to restate and clarify the schedule for Yocto Project 1.2 M4 (= milestone 4). If you are concerned or have patches you would like to merge,= please see the following dates: >>>> >>>> 1. RC3 official patch cut-off time: 12:00AM April 8th, 2012, PDT >>>> 2. RC3 build: April 11th, 2012, PDT >>>> 3. RC4 official patch cut-off time: 12:00AM April 15th, 2012, PDT >>>> 4. RC4 build: April 18th, 2012, PDT >>>> 5. YP 1.2 release: April 27th, 2012, PDT >>>> >>>> You can also check out the schedule here: https://www.google.com/calen= dar/embed?height=3D600&wkst=3D1&bgcolor=3D%23FFFFFF&src=3Dmg0m150m30gs891eq= qhtfu5jgg%40group.calendar.google.com&color=3D%238C500B&src=3Dsc7rov4ck552t= 2f0pav120t7r0%40group.calendar.google.com&color=3D%23528800&src=3Dtheyoctop= roject%40gmail.com&color=3D%23182C57&ctz=3DAmerica%2FLos_Angeles >>>> >>>> Please feel free to let me and Beth know if you have any concerns or q= uestions. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Song >>>> PM, Yocto Project >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't see any commits tagged for these milestones in >>> git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core at the moment. Will there be a >>> release tag or a release branch created on the git repository when YP >>> 1.2 comes out, to indicate people that there's a "stable" version of >>> oe-core they can use ? >> >> Yes, there will be a branch created on OE-Core. >> >> At this point the actual branch naming/tagging is a little in flux. >> There was some discussion about this at collaboration summit and the BSP >> summit but there was no conclusion. >> >> I've tried to write an email on the subject and it basically goes around >> in circles. Ideally we need a scheme which can be used in all the layers >> which doesn't contain numbers as these may conflict with various layer >> schemes. The poky release names at least do that. Ideally people also >> want something sortable with more context such as the year. Doing this >> without numbers is harder. > > I'm still a big fan of using 'yoctoproject-1.2' as substring for tags and= branches. The objections I heard to that didn't make sense to me, but I se= e this as a purely technical matter where others see it as something differ= ent :) > I think that string is fine as long as its just for yocto but I think for OE-Core we are going to do a General release so tagging that with something yocto project will be very confusing unless we plan to do different releases of OE-Core for general availability and yocto project. I dont think we have bandwidth for that. And since poky repository makes a copy of OE-Core metadata it can be tagged in yoctoproject specific tags since OE-Core is at center of all layers I would propose that other layers when tagged contain OE-Core's release tag in their own tags name so something like - >> I'm reluctant to change the numbering/branch scheme at this point in a >> release as its unfair to release engineering and the documentation >> maintainers. Lets keep it as we have it. Its quite generic. > > > "it's only software" :p > > regards, > > Koen > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core