From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f48.google.com (mail-qv1-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.1964.1626998657483155716 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:04:17 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qrpQ7HAs; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.219.48, mailfrom: raj.khem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qv1-f48.google.com with SMTP id jz6so590109qvb.2 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:04:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VC0cd768BNRXwIqV4fWJuCBKNZ8mGYjWvuLGbU8fSQI=; b=qrpQ7HAsHt9hdJjGx0TQAq4Gdpoa3z5rujr76PZZTw5LZb+sr3eptV3Ovs9MtcOyAw tATlk6ET4KAT7fdNQ5D7Bcs/UBQqgxWw3U222KtljCSNc7+TN/ezLwFaumIzM0bxuWkV MUCfVNCz7tzqRlAqWE2lrkQacX0Ui7fdFVPHUodRy5k/0tnVInjPMeA8a73AUHk2sd/p ZbjQf5Ls8Qyw9vNvQgFYOQFm4cRcNM6xJBN25S1NC8KEoYyrDBtB3YEbGvexQlWKwrBG Expm3k6XmD9HdjqRyYER29gm+mcDnE1ntoQrZ2yFbuIujKjAI6p7I3kbJ1O5xQ00tLxQ QS/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VC0cd768BNRXwIqV4fWJuCBKNZ8mGYjWvuLGbU8fSQI=; b=qFBzEn8bNfhIB8tCZqY8Te2dTXO2X5C0u84e3mhR9KDfrb+Icg1VjdXjIjyjYP1fbu 2S1II0S6EeVlUfdufTCYyx/Vb6/Y985hgYh5t5B2FOfFYDGysNCDbZVJbpoSz6Vdey5r +4f4qXUV4/taUz8yIvSA3ChNm4LaYKnZHMmghgWkY8UhugpX/rZObXN4FKAPa/kfLUi7 0ocmeOP50sG6KIXQG3KkrnI73isc24oMmqow9kPGVIsAG1uaT/wU0T4Rp4JcYdciAuQL LXRGJ9nNcF9ZDb5on/vw0oqZ97kiqMxt92KXgJzDxSwB59jHeUxs8ksVfZSvpFhsrxTg AxRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qdzkrdFFrjNPH/bZqmQF8ViLxWTtwNPX6OoFQRXAuMii9PuKn mP5BhVTe+Z+BWW8snZ6fT91wO3KKhHahPYxMBm4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9p/5pBg/hdR2c4kh6R1W4bJ48n3j++NyDG5s+6CGtz+bUODw0ikQWXQsiLZL+Ysxl9h04cXoAUT10zxeiuA8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:767:: with SMTP id f7mr2338970qvz.16.1626998656618; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:04:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210721021108.1082410-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Khem Raj" Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:04:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] binutils: Upgrade to 2.37 branch To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa550005c7bf24c4" --000000000000fa550005c7bf24c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:38 PM Alexandre Belloni < alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote: > On 22/07/2021 07:56:11-0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:22 AM Alexandre Belloni < > > alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Khem, > > > > > > On 20/07/2021 19:11:08-0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > This izOs next/latest release branch for binutils > > > > Drop backports and CVE fixes which already are applied upstream > > > > > > > > bfd_stdint.h has been removed in favor of using stdint.h > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > > > --- > > > > V2: Fixes SDK builds for mingw and glew build with GLES > > > > > > > > > > This didn't apply properly, I fixed it up, can you check > > > > > > > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=3Dabello= ni/master-next&id=3Defb06e3e03c750944bfa40314dae70c054bdaed4 > > > > > > > What portion did not apply ? It looks alright to me but want to know so= I > > can correct my branch since I have few other patches lined up before it= I > > wonder if that=E2=80=99s the issue or something else > > Almost none of it applied, it is most likely caused by whitespace > changes as this was the main difference between v1 and v2. What I did is Interesting I wonder why it happened > > take v1 and changed the SRCREV to be the one of v2. Ok if it was just that Change then we are fine here > > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com > --000000000000fa550005c7bf24c4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:38 PM Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:
On 22/07/2021 07:56:1= 1-0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:22 AM Alexandre Belloni <
> ale= xandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Khem,
> >
> > On 20/07/2021 19:11:08-0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > This izOs next/latest release branch for binutils
> > > Drop backports and CVE fixes which already are applied upstr= eam
> > >
> > > bfd_stdint.h has been removed in favor of using stdint.h
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > V2: Fixes SDK builds for mingw and glew build with GLES
> > >
> >
> > This didn't apply properly, I fixed it up, can you check
> >
> > https://git.openembedded.org= /openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=3Dabelloni/master-next&id=3Defb06e= 3e03c750944bfa40314dae70c054bdaed4
> >
>
> What portion did not apply ? It looks alright to me but want to know s= o I
> can correct my branch since I have few other patches lined up before i= t I
> wonder if that=E2=80=99s the issue or something else

Almost none of it applied, it is most likely caused by whitespace
changes as this was the main difference between v1 and v2. What I did is

Interesting I wonde= r why it happened=C2=A0
take v1 and changed the SRCREV to be the one of v2.

Ok if it was just that Change then we ar= e fine here




--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https:= //bootlin.com
--000000000000fa550005c7bf24c4--