From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-f194.google.com (mail-qt1-f194.google.com [209.85.160.194]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8BD7ED41 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 21:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f194.google.com with SMTP id y26so43330355qto.4 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:15:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=STr1kzKUCGx1GgQDbcXCGdLULfNIL6N9PaIMMzu8NEk=; b=KZkDIoGghTxoRHsKie3TO2Ba1NA7YTViZ8LOyIwB9C9vu3v1TRD686sJpz5Vl1cBUY 3RFwsieyoWVnBVOdK7RWmqPVM9gUnyZ0I0ra0uStnwSRm4Ui6FArtwDotFmmTmjGf9w2 jBbvyUqPlV8y3Y5tnRwFiISW55SOTzzU34domp7KJkuKXvnZyZh96QSOodVjS1MHAXk8 KpnsMprNXtuPPJihEQtTNKlcfoPYoyS8UoP9OJkry9pgZtcBZcUdPDgeG2ZmECwyo3SP yKLD99XQi10xIR70+DQfFhUpclP7xtRwOBuTIE7ZG2z4uettvDvkWPudrtM97dRUHQsO km0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=STr1kzKUCGx1GgQDbcXCGdLULfNIL6N9PaIMMzu8NEk=; b=hv0U+qunI4HeE3FPyBiuuaakz8VIJsF9U4BbuBfX5rGi8Qs9FYFPwyGA2pRM8G5Ygw m5T4czmPJ3I99mbWINzLzoBMXILUURYhozNJSZ78e8+WDfA5+vihqoNelb1fQrCwiOCP qF5qpP/uPrFtwf1jDLpr/lIjVkmrQ+hQ9x6xdOaUXjizL8beTCmUFfUGUpXh2vhYOik/ 3cxNUualnDRwvBdEHq3drSBuDMOjw0M0ZLIzJWA2AMNNATYRIXjUMQ2Gv2V/2QacR//D F56erNgB90SNos0jGqlwR2Mga7QPafLVoCfeErh5GjGWB5Sp9s6YTe1MrwMjUYE5g6Xz u0TQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWAeygu2YDs0WV5vM3dw/r9VCjSqNtI1GewESNkK2+6eUkHrCIF 4ElrRVU4ZuzpqhIa3HVNWBc0XbuTMlD+0ZFvXSs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwysuEIjwBWkAHXvC80vkZNiQuC/KN7NUk2nFMUyLuvezrcvlsOJgt3ghmEHezBoISLtDaRkp9N6GEWlZqRGrw= X-Received: by 2002:aed:36e8:: with SMTP id f95mr53879262qtb.88.1563916535348; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:15:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190722144809.14972-1-ross.burton@intel.com> <393734e9ff3b6095b159744b01405a0b0616269d.camel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Khem Raj Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:15:18 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Burton, Ross" Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] libical: upgrade to 3.0.5 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 21:15:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 2:12 PM Burton, Ross wrote: > > The last release of Orage was four years ago: I suggest removing that > from meta-xfce instead of keeping everyone else using an old version > of libical. thats the latest unfortunately. I think a simple fix would be to drop is_utc field setting in orage since it seems to gone in libical3, I will try to cookup a patch and try > > Ross > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 22:04, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > this is causing a failure in meta-xfce > > > > https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/253910/ > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:12 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:05 PM Mittal, Anuj wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2019-07-22 at 17:59 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:17 PM Mittal, Anuj > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2019-07-22 at 15:48 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > > > > > > > -LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0" > > > > > > > > > > this should be MPL-2.0 | LGPL-2.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > > > > > > > "file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \ > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6" > > > > > > > +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2" > > > > > > > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > > > > > > > "file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \ > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \ > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3" > > > > > > > > > > > > Should this be MPL-2.0 instead? This is causing warnings: > > > > > > > > > > the license is MPL-2.0 but the license file name is MPL2.txt so this > > > > > seems fine. > > > > > > > > I meant the field in LICENSE. Quoted the wrong text. > > > > > > reply quote confused me. yes it is wrong. It should be MPL-2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks.