From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com (mail-io0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EAF77230 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 08:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f81so128224399iof.0 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:54:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Y3nrLsM6/6GwXv//EYTqCZMAoFuuKlMNGjIOyj7OX3k=; b=TVlnpk6URr88oHXOhzqvT2NsqGjVGsSLb8rXHbb8nUyCYpGR2Ep5Z87F975fsvCm0o XzpEHGKu3//IoY8FdQeAgQr9FmdGQbILvJt5+OyuYoyV9d/bNqvPOZ8BJwhlV1dwAq8Q XMyA76LZuq3tXAT0NN6qXovxRpbbNq4NG0t4h8XE+kHFkfgufjLLR8TD0EgPOSh9QAz3 vy3I9WOb15UBw4NNRTmZq2xRrLdmeGH9I9ILnQZ9MTAmloyQp+sLQg7zy4N/tNozQ0GB vD7tfbKAm5AWhkf9w/7E9nZ5ufAPk26lPP2wr9j3QB6jJWJrwisxByRUT0NJWe5pFWdh 8+ig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Y3nrLsM6/6GwXv//EYTqCZMAoFuuKlMNGjIOyj7OX3k=; b=Q5AZyoa0d7+Zgb+eu8IP0TIuAtlAcRHp/sHOR8rDQqAnCMx2Z5n07/EljsHrnz2pZ7 MIoII9ug44ut2zwjWPLIRy+Cv3YlzB5Sv+AA6vbVHgUPgZCtanGTxYlE6YGF0Nkvu55k QBp/ZFwmsbrYnvtU8tMhQazMw5H6bYs58IPXxj4iK5ZpMoGPOrVj5lIF3QNubylnsHl+ aXh1Uoj/PdD5gdHlhHw25Q8XriN8Q03BqfW5x6sLOtLm0Y2A0gdDmO/eqY0JsDedhFTA 5sYzhZRoKcHRIkVkEw9ESqgUGZaSbgJ9CBFmI8yG954rAsV29212X7k2ioz75IkAaRyV GrZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSfpOkYiJoXe8VbnDmmYPa+rXdxRk225ueM+UzPzsRiYSCQzK8y0cJdr5ka9dKv09RZKfjoiJM4eVWx/w== X-Received: by 10.107.34.79 with SMTP id i76mr20571210ioi.195.1454230449052; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:54:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.46.219 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:53:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1454229127.27087.11.camel@linuxfoundation.org> References: <2747032A-1F56-4CA6-860C-484B9292A0B5@gmail.com> <56AB73C0.8030505@linux.intel.com> <1454229127.27087.11.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Khem Raj Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:53:39 -0800 Message-ID: To: Richard Purdie Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [RFT] Glibc 2.23 and binutils 2.26 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 08:54:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 06:44 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Alexander Kanavin >> wrote: >> > On 01/17/2016 01:54 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> > > >> > > upstream glibc and binutils release branches have been cut out >> > > and are >> > > being made ready for next release >> > > I have put together update patchset for both of them >> > > >> > > here are the branches >> > > >> > > https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/tree/kraj/binutils-2.26 >> > > https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/tree/kraj/glibc-2.23 >> > >> > >> > Hello Khem, >> > >> > when are you planning to submit these? >> >> binutils exposes a problem for ppc as a result kernel fails to build. >> The fix is to drop >> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-devto >> ols/gcc/gcc-5.3/0030-Enable-SPE-AltiVec-generation-on-powepc-linux >> -target.patch >> >> that patch makes generic ppc configs to be specific to fsl ppc. >> but we need context as to why this was done >> >> glibc is still not released. > > I ran the binutils upgrade in -next on the autobuilder. It looked > mostly good but with poky-lsb we did see: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-x86-64-lsb/b > uilds/635/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-x86-64-lsb/b > uilds/635/steps/BuildImages_1/logs/stdio it looks like -fpie is the factor here, I will try to reproduce it here locally may be we can get away by using system zlib instead of internal one > > Cheers, > > Richard >