From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com (mail-vk0-f49.google.com [209.85.213.49]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684806FFA4; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 19:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id p9so134628996vkd.3; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:59:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NfXwFwCxx+g9j6Uqp/wfk2zuUinjYgia+sn5ihCiWc8=; b=kOi4TF77NP/8PVyrv+hu/lbqtuuSM1zL/50pVUf0TsKVPvD59DgipJkabMVzPkt2Yz JE8zU3QnE3JFqz65YfSord2ESU0XLiIyWQaUVBZhmc+QUmKICMyxZb1lEpkm6b/ilfde 6hORcjEW5GmLhNnH1EDxEjdTjmCVXeZGyhqXxsDf1b5+5r85m8v1+cLblzdhJO3twspy iO1SBshdoAqfIJG6xoBDRrLd1MSLWJwclRf+A5nEuI2j8EuNJv/edwSnno4ICZYm26ir WqKh/jTOzKZPb1LVEtEkkZwL2lhIJrNRffx7dgUQAL4cK1FUp2dJFpJwIZPEb0x1eZSE fK1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=NfXwFwCxx+g9j6Uqp/wfk2zuUinjYgia+sn5ihCiWc8=; b=GqeMV31hXb84ogq3/YE4KtIheDNtcy8UkKSZ5Jmw4nsHiHa1Y4K85jhCPc3Lu6ISSj 6IsHMs0pWL5gVGNEGgAbmKo23bjQPazhL4FqVvBsTe3y8nsdRG3MaFZrnMxJ37+mCa6M niVqQkiVID4Anv0beTyt1CxBdXcM2+EWf5NiBj9iJZ48aq2DG8PZ4In5E7TRHY4EAUDn cJdB6t3O8HK+HTaSyii4hRlzhhAHcfnQGhDZbakt7hmrCfKWDU+bFsmGjZuWzV9iJCUL t9BeDF4cXJm36VXQoXLUYbPG/uhGP11Pu43rtJe31W3O40k7fLlOwpVWyScoRiz14Oli aKiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03nRelIBVFXa/pZvnKs/ayV/JuCR6X9jpely+ZDyIDtXVRnqxLFHuRU9md9SOTlshowbxalj04We5/mJA== X-Received: by 10.31.234.199 with SMTP id i190mr14774433vkh.31.1480622368309; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:59:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.48.87 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:58:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20161128225759.9756-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> <8632C69E-1C6B-482D-AF15-965F55F0AF88@gmail.com> From: Khem Raj Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:58:57 -0800 Message-ID: To: openembeded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libva: Import from meta-intel and update to 1.7.3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 19:59:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 1 December 2016 at 03:42, Khem Raj wrote: > >> >> If libva goes in, can we get libva-intel-driver in as well? Those go >> >> hand-in-glove currently. >> >> >> > >> > Khem, does the AMD BSP use that? I'd have thought that bit was actually >> > meta-intel specific. >> >> its intel BSPs specific > > > So I'd endorse libva for oe-core, and the intel-driver remains in > meta-intel. I am fine with proposal. This is time for someone to raise objections. > > Ross > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com (mail-vk0-f49.google.com [209.85.213.49]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684806FFA4; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 19:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id p9so134628996vkd.3; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:59:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NfXwFwCxx+g9j6Uqp/wfk2zuUinjYgia+sn5ihCiWc8=; b=kOi4TF77NP/8PVyrv+hu/lbqtuuSM1zL/50pVUf0TsKVPvD59DgipJkabMVzPkt2Yz JE8zU3QnE3JFqz65YfSord2ESU0XLiIyWQaUVBZhmc+QUmKICMyxZb1lEpkm6b/ilfde 6hORcjEW5GmLhNnH1EDxEjdTjmCVXeZGyhqXxsDf1b5+5r85m8v1+cLblzdhJO3twspy iO1SBshdoAqfIJG6xoBDRrLd1MSLWJwclRf+A5nEuI2j8EuNJv/edwSnno4ICZYm26ir WqKh/jTOzKZPb1LVEtEkkZwL2lhIJrNRffx7dgUQAL4cK1FUp2dJFpJwIZPEb0x1eZSE fK1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=NfXwFwCxx+g9j6Uqp/wfk2zuUinjYgia+sn5ihCiWc8=; b=GqeMV31hXb84ogq3/YE4KtIheDNtcy8UkKSZ5Jmw4nsHiHa1Y4K85jhCPc3Lu6ISSj 6IsHMs0pWL5gVGNEGgAbmKo23bjQPazhL4FqVvBsTe3y8nsdRG3MaFZrnMxJ37+mCa6M niVqQkiVID4Anv0beTyt1CxBdXcM2+EWf5NiBj9iJZ48aq2DG8PZ4In5E7TRHY4EAUDn cJdB6t3O8HK+HTaSyii4hRlzhhAHcfnQGhDZbakt7hmrCfKWDU+bFsmGjZuWzV9iJCUL t9BeDF4cXJm36VXQoXLUYbPG/uhGP11Pu43rtJe31W3O40k7fLlOwpVWyScoRiz14Oli aKiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03nRelIBVFXa/pZvnKs/ayV/JuCR6X9jpely+ZDyIDtXVRnqxLFHuRU9md9SOTlshowbxalj04We5/mJA== X-Received: by 10.31.234.199 with SMTP id i190mr14774433vkh.31.1480622368309; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:59:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.48.87 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:58:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20161128225759.9756-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> <8632C69E-1C6B-482D-AF15-965F55F0AF88@gmail.com> From: Khem Raj Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:58:57 -0800 Message-ID: To: openembeded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] libva: Import from meta-intel and update to 1.7.3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 19:59:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 1 December 2016 at 03:42, Khem Raj wrote: > >> >> If libva goes in, can we get libva-intel-driver in as well? Those go >> >> hand-in-glove currently. >> >> >> > >> > Khem, does the AMD BSP use that? I'd have thought that bit was actually >> > meta-intel specific. >> >> its intel BSPs specific > > > So I'd endorse libva for oe-core, and the intel-driver remains in > meta-intel. I am fine with proposal. This is time for someone to raise objections. > > Ross > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel