From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14252E013D9 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lagu2 with SMTP id u2so524465lag.35 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:32:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=6dI5RQ2krEaN6lNZoFpcfKVyX6P8ss7CaAnLkubafMU=; b=X0GIMGmE1EkkMLcyt2kCihklzRezO9DhpX/NZWTrFsDHQ0QqFgRhoO+6Mr0a1f3qtT LL4HPqG82AbGya+uMA13nJ8+ImAssu7zrisi3XnRUNw7P63Uhof+Wvjwc8QLCY05vOK8 C871fHfi+g0JcG0DZ6XlFIop07Zs2qykr0IG2JZuax4HrPegF+m+FJXRZkXddsYz1LmD 2evKQJz26pyJHt1pKfdurm4rwUasDsMTcn3KdgvE3FD0fLZ37KfGZMqdzuJFiaSv0Ao0 /nH6a0ve2pLwCEHotfaQ2J8nQ/Rqq13LszpvT+sQNwxFkXFnOtzE5DWc4M1/O9mKNSaE F0FA== Received: by 10.152.115.38 with SMTP id jl6mr1242711lab.24.1333089158968; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:32:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.3.161 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:32:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F71F122.5070802@linux.intel.com> From: Khem Raj Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:32:08 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Barros Pena, Belen" Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , Giulia Piu Subject: Re: Deleting layers in Hob X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:32:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: > Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto > layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am inclined to > make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete this layer > in Hob). > > What do you think? bad idea. Unless you intend to shackle hob to yocto. Is that the intention ?