From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 66362E00798; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:40:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.223.175 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (raj.khem[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FD1E003C1 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x19so4143215ier.20 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:39:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZjbN8dEznFrmEcztnqTk28X0wAc/+hs1ZUMZihnIkhU=; b=pwvCM85y0VZ826hhcZDZr5s6mbG1s5HJa3THrJ8NFMC9jeoPk5u1Ge1+2KYyzAVxWx m1BZO+BcHwTJHHjtePpuGQCZpX9cOwKe5lnBw5VkPXsIa7wYL808wXHYG9N1SP9FtKV7 IygTmcFfiVMWBIkNX1R2xwdU3vQ7ypMI3Mu6ryvsRJSwkAIgUTw4Hjr4s/hOzE3lPQhi MDqgnm6Fh6p7FJWuFCtL4uorovTJmpuB+oCD2lbseWPCmQqhknhXBSEzk/Fpu/fDFx6z c+JlCnA0xpAvjwy+RWIdNo01dCUfhKapfM7BOPvKdrc2vsf43YqPTC82iiM0Jn85gDGo MSMQ== X-Received: by 10.50.25.71 with SMTP id a7mr6596946igg.17.1406313595852; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:39:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.78.105 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:39:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Khem Raj Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:39:25 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Yocto discussion list Subject: Re: dev manual definition of "Image" is totally wrong X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 18:40:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > here: > > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#yocto-project-terms > > the definition of "Image" refers to the generated artifacts of a > build, whereas the standard usage (as typified by the link) more > correctly refers to things like core-image-minimal. core-image-minimal is just a name/type of image and image is a generated artifact ( output result ) of a build using OE > > i'll let someone higher up the food chain resolve that. > > rday > > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA > http://crashcourse.ca > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday > LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday > ======================================================================== > > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto