From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id F2289E00809; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 02:54:04 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (raj.khem[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.223.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE12E0070B for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 02:53:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x19so16622853ier.10 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 02:53:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=oD0GB+EKJseNotxg5QhfyRyWLlVheG0ec78iMeCBGSM=; b=J1R7R+9c4YPNZ7YK4kfp/1THBJujM1UPZsqZxLAZkU4dkMbsj+P7L4+D0TmhZgqLDG +euX6tHDN2CdB8r1p2tJmmn0chZO9b4MxSAESrCkqzGm79vgJuUlxAkovCRGJ+hXLc+U qdK8756Ey09k2z0V3El77TZDPDw+yyku4PlQUlR58hkDqMcD9Nd9YLEsO8oLwtRt9ZJS iHXM/7vsK1fO5NkeO7csObSveLrZGN8zkuTT1DIu0VX/trvre2aibCMbi9zMU18vWely lUgWjhcth1K5VadnCQqJP9woKRkTImX3qMEe2vgbtmqvvEYI/dcFvcsvmjCHd2uikkye mVZQ== X-Received: by 10.50.29.68 with SMTP id i4mr11009020igh.4.1422874437924; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 02:53:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.117.7 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 02:53:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Khem Raj Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 02:53:27 -0800 Message-ID: To: "Burton, Ross" Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , openembeded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:54:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Ross Please repull. I did not push from right machine first time. Now it should be good. Thanks for quick turnaround Thanks -Khem On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi Khem, > > On 2 February 2015 at 10:02, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> I have put together upgrade to gcc 4.9.2 as well as glibc 2.21 ( >> upcoming ) on a contrib branch ( top 2 patches) its has not got much >> testing besides x86 qemu thus far. > > > I'm seeing these failures when cherry-picking the top two commits to current > poky/master. > > gcc-cross-initial: > > | /data/poky-master/tmp/work-shared/gcc-4.9.2-r0/gcc-4.9.2/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c: > In function 'void expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes(tree)': > | > /data/poky-master/tmp/work-shared/gcc-4.9.2-r0/gcc-4.9.2/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:334:27: > error: 'struct gcc_target' has no member named 'dwarf_frame_reg_mode' > > cross-localdef-native: > > | In file included from glibc/locale/programs/locarchive.c:696:0: > | glibc/locale/programs/../../intl/l10nflist.c: In function > '_nl_normalize_codeset': > | glibc/locale/programs/../../intl/l10nflist.c:306:12: error: missing binary > operator before token "(" > | glibc/locale/programs/../../intl/l10nflist.c:313:9: error: > '_nl_C_locobj_ptr' undeclared (first use in this function) > | glibc/locale/programs/../../intl/l10nflist.c:313:9: note: each undeclared > identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > Ross From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF887605F1; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l13so16185414iga.1; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 02:53:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=oD0GB+EKJseNotxg5QhfyRyWLlVheG0ec78iMeCBGSM=; b=J1R7R+9c4YPNZ7YK4kfp/1THBJujM1UPZsqZxLAZkU4dkMbsj+P7L4+D0TmhZgqLDG +euX6tHDN2CdB8r1p2tJmmn0chZO9b4MxSAESrCkqzGm79vgJuUlxAkovCRGJ+hXLc+U qdK8756Ey09k2z0V3El77TZDPDw+yyku4PlQUlR58hkDqMcD9Nd9YLEsO8oLwtRt9ZJS iHXM/7vsK1fO5NkeO7csObSveLrZGN8zkuTT1DIu0VX/trvre2aibCMbi9zMU18vWely lUgWjhcth1K5VadnCQqJP9woKRkTImX3qMEe2vgbtmqvvEYI/dcFvcsvmjCHd2uikkye mVZQ== X-Received: by 10.50.29.68 with SMTP id i4mr11009020igh.4.1422874437924; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 02:53:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.117.7 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 02:53:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Khem Raj Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 02:53:27 -0800 Message-ID: To: "Burton, Ross" Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , openembeded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:54:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Ross Please repull. I did not push from right machine first time. Now it should be good. Thanks for quick turnaround Thanks -Khem On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi Khem, > > On 2 February 2015 at 10:02, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> I have put together upgrade to gcc 4.9.2 as well as glibc 2.21 ( >> upcoming ) on a contrib branch ( top 2 patches) its has not got much >> testing besides x86 qemu thus far. > > > I'm seeing these failures when cherry-picking the top two commits to current > poky/master. > > gcc-cross-initial: > > | /data/poky-master/tmp/work-shared/gcc-4.9.2-r0/gcc-4.9.2/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c: > In function 'void expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes(tree)': > | > /data/poky-master/tmp/work-shared/gcc-4.9.2-r0/gcc-4.9.2/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:334:27: > error: 'struct gcc_target' has no member named 'dwarf_frame_reg_mode' > > cross-localdef-native: > > | In file included from glibc/locale/programs/locarchive.c:696:0: > | glibc/locale/programs/../../intl/l10nflist.c: In function > '_nl_normalize_codeset': > | glibc/locale/programs/../../intl/l10nflist.c:306:12: error: missing binary > operator before token "(" > | glibc/locale/programs/../../intl/l10nflist.c:313:9: error: > '_nl_C_locobj_ptr' undeclared (first use in this function) > | glibc/locale/programs/../../intl/l10nflist.c:313:9: note: each undeclared > identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > Ross