From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com (mail-qt1-f195.google.com [209.85.160.195]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.4364.1603333302102849951 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:21:42 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nb1R0upZ; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.160.195, mailfrom: raj.khem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id c5so79394qtw.3 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:21:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=e+bQ1Y5t79721x++KTUiLlmgTeJgnOxSCQYqpefYuBM=; b=nb1R0upZkv1p16XNszA85ppAJD4JXxvB9KdvOrgPsQKaepOJv0a5/UgIYEC6IkiGbD rrAZVGk4qplOqvfjYyzbWFjz86vNBMWUvt4JP0YqaDC9VsCeNnlOEF6yGfitUDGd1xBZ dW8GJhimTdvMYIcJSTykSn2p4oby0+Rl80bkAZLFUoRHPj1vazBUmz/XK1Lv1IeIYHgc P1s5lRjxFgzqygp87uAaAmkRyxLmNuFSopCroAFFP7pS5BdoICu4+dLSAQ79LV3+L59l DzBr4mkDcwg20ANKB/nhbIV0RCcQ/jHIheYbNVn9DuTpamCntos/kp9PVD2UmMCUAz8x ZrsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=e+bQ1Y5t79721x++KTUiLlmgTeJgnOxSCQYqpefYuBM=; b=eyetvC1jhe3AdeMtuvkCNc5JIDlgEHnanoyexdxrTqvkrgg0S3iIrC1//ffguwZY2i jVZNt5vzXoEpBZZJ0KjctVo0/bv+f+hE+3c/V/uo+BfjpVtNKDrvkkiRNQpirIS7HfWq 24xHb5fuoOBnCLHDxDhG8tyhvkx8pRW0/vuEqlI6sFyMB1xTpceB2Dy/Tjuk83bqrxSu KM205xOoHJdtysZGz/825OwhHUSqOBMyrsKLDw8F+hylVnnX8Vlrebx+5O8WYGZNUr79 Db/6ArQRJGK4zYbDOVsKmTUg6LrB6zJRLIfTLczZ5bmaAyHxLhXORNkPb1PKi4tGmyCs n5vw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304YsEgdStN77DI8QfYjvSF6ulCzHHmdwv5SF+7S34wHSZt6m+I wDY19mUEWGD+vcvpcWhXcJ/kmarCghPzbt1d414= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiERX4V9JtSymbAZTpz5u8Iv70wwkJBPscblVLxQF0Jx2H4Xva3xbYnfUW4fnDFnAjAZbqY7nBf2jIbk8muGQ= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:57d1:: with SMTP id w17mr129422qta.194.1603333301112; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:21:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201021155857.2841570-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <5d383a0d9c3aa724fc1aaac4fcd6d75fe5f2dec2.camel@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <5d383a0d9c3aa724fc1aaac4fcd6d75fe5f2dec2.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: "Khem Raj" Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:21:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add new recipe for squashfs-tools-ng To: Richard Purdie Cc: Luca Bocassi , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:02 PM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 16:58 +0100, Luca Bocassi wrote: > > From: Luca Boccassi > > > > The main difference with squashfs-tools is the availability > > of a shared library and a programmatic interface, rather > > than just command-line tools. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi > > --- > > .../squashfs-tools-ng_git.bb | 37 > > +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/squashfs-tools-ng/squashfs- > > tools-ng_git.bb > > Should we be switching over to squashfs-tools-ng and removing squashfs- > tools? I'm not sure we want to support both versions? I am not sure if we want to switch to ng yet as on option its good to have. Perhaps in meta-oe or some other place. > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > >