From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9CE60034 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so5736879ied.1 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:51:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2oGaLur8Kv/0cHQBNjE2gyzrwwrmrJqLThijyhT6j8A=; b=Y/5sQ2DjilVp9WqMaUeI1R+oOiMke/T6IMi77gKm9uaHBFBToauahqWoQ0vK6+JTAh VJiC+uFGK5vWY26B3O70E2CE9bf1EtoBTZHtb20nCitjoPdgD2VTTzlvieH5xsZ3JTOX MlZ0w5s61pAX3yxYWfNJJtqM765Op/puJg5oUzqFeqkzxS32Ps8R94BehxvMKzt3QzwA faGb0P3rXkHoP+Iyy78CFL0a9NXGD1p6XAUR8RkmjCGq18NwS3+XPdpVJEEJuwytS6TU SObCvq4J7jdFJADrovK11tZSM1Rt+pQgBYICEKouI88gQEwO4zXarWaNA28upLJiUHh9 AYKw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.89.72 with SMTP id f8mr27839604icm.24.1427223111168; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.117.7 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.117.7 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:51:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1427045315-13142-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <8A51FBCF-FD07-4A7A-9829-14964E58A121@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:51:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.12 Cc: pnandyala , Zoltan Kuscsik , knagabhirava Subject: Re: meta-browser][PATCH V2] cef3: Add recipe for Chromium Embedded Framework X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:51:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mar 24, 2015 9:36 AM, "Otavio Salvador" wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > > >> On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:56 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> > >> > >> I'd prefer to do it once and avoid adding another recipe and handle > >> same problems we had solved there. Also this allows for example the > >> use of i.MX patches on meta-fsl-arm. > > > > My usecase is not i.MX moreover I do not have i.MX h/w to test as well, current set work fine for the architectures I need it for, if someone wants to help in testing on other machines, its welcome. however as I said, it will be in subsequent work to unite both recipes due to the overhead as explained in last email. > > I am not asking you to test cef3 on i.MX, this is fine. I don't want > another giant build recipe with duplication. I am aware of that. This let's other folks hands on it with a working version. Moving cef to latest chromium is a bigger exercise and will delay this. That's the motivation. > > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel