From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2E9EFE0071E; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:00:14 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (raj.khem[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-qk0-f171.google.com (mail-qk0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AB4E00444 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:00:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id o6so61089504qkc.2 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:00:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=SOx4gY++2yBRplJ5klLMxqjkyJ7y5OpbxOWbC890z18=; b=RUnuTY3S6RTj8A+P3jaz/D+7ihvHiBNsjqjAqCMXfDcpPGYhZLpQOZr3czvYkkf8Er 8Cgx7qIs57jR/jQpieNXkmazG2bE3HrhS63QH2s4Qq/tK5Vm84I/YhTZ44lG16gQa8Ph B4gHOsV6huANMKeZ7c3VS0oLQKUxDXoA3LPSQfE15G2fqm7ABt5uvQu+Enex82QzfL6O HS+LuqDSo4NxFosYy3DgmyMGnRz2+zISeJ/rzOgI9vPxTn3VHS597BPyPgg7IkGBV1y2 I8l1yi79a6a7MSau/98B1fVcGRFLyiIJctb0c5aeKVdd7exW9liZrutDUh00snjgLs19 r3PA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=SOx4gY++2yBRplJ5klLMxqjkyJ7y5OpbxOWbC890z18=; b=ZwiMe5mCuVsUc8bvKW9gG7PW4pcYXK0VNEg6cSZWsRxZvy2UMCoVGU6dt6N5wWmujZ ck4f82E0r8mDo7SY9AjlUacQVdHaDT524HPDgox7e3uKoLix6bpz33bpex16/NpIltko upGWBcCmCMJdNcpcpAmY/9C2Cqcf+9FDfrxk7xbVGqNGKExmWBPT0nD6osLK61dhjcp1 8uC+5U70UT59Z7mt05BS61HEdvUp9Ibt5T1Zen09zs8qMkHOZ/hbR+UoluLQeKxTlpG7 JONyAfAmldvVFOmjEWN0BgzenqNNn8RnVZB5AYaZ2mGUBnVXcj6JKuKt+MSV50Ob6e89 BWFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQUbgIiTWKtNl3u50uqTTWTqgm3ZxkEIHqQx0y+BLUMO6LhJNAstbOwns9U0wHf10cf2eW4WT10ooix0Q== X-Received: by 10.55.75.203 with SMTP id y194mr24194145qka.2.1455580809471; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:00:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.130.196 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:59:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Khem Raj Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:59:40 -0800 Message-ID: To: Prasant J Cc: Poky Project Subject: Re: Can I force a particular recipe to rebuild every time? X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion & patch submission for meta-yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Prasant J wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm writing my own layer for the Intel Atom Board. > > > - Is there a way to force a recipe to be rebuild every time > core-image-minimal-initramfs is built? you can use do_[nostamp] = "1" in recipe. However, its a bad idea to have such code in production builds, it may be ok during early development. > > - Is there a ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS equivalent for > core-image-minimal-initramfs image? > > > > Regards, Pj > -- > _______________________________________________ > poky mailing list > poky@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky