From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto: Update linux-yocto for 3.2 and 3.4
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:23:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMKF1sqyfTS=yZh0CFut1zQMqFawzDaM0XsPmMex239Z5OwZwQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5047A2B2.9070106@windriver.com>
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield
<bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> wrote:
> On 12-09-05 03:03 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Saul Wold<sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is to prevent the HW BSP generated by the autobuild from being used
>>> in
>>> production, it's added by the autobuilder to the HW bsps.
>>
>>
>> thats fine. However, I am using linux-yocto unmodified from meta-yocto
>> so this will now
>> force me to generate my own bsp if I dont want this feature right ?
>
>
> Only the binaries produced by the release builds that use meta-tlk
> would have this issue. Even then a single rebuild without that layer
> removes the time limit option.
>
diffstats confused me
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend | 2 ++
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend | 6 ++++++
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend | 6 ++++++
and I thought it was being applied to meta-yocto
but then individual diffs showed that it was being applied to meta-tlk
prepending
[meta-tlk] in subject instead of just [yocto] would have filtered this
message from my
eyes.
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 16:56 [PATCH 0/3 v3] Meta-tlk update Saul Wold
2012-09-05 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto: Update linux-yocto for 3.2 and 3.4 Saul Wold
2012-09-05 17:08 ` Khem Raj
2012-09-05 17:15 ` Saul Wold
2012-09-05 17:43 ` Khem Raj
2012-09-05 18:16 ` Saul Wold
2012-09-05 19:03 ` Khem Raj
2012-09-05 19:06 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-09-05 19:23 ` Khem Raj [this message]
2012-09-05 21:38 ` Tom Zanussi
2012-09-05 16:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] base-files: add /etc/motd with TLK info Saul Wold
2012-09-05 21:38 ` Tom Zanussi
2012-09-05 16:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] psplash: Add TLK info to psplash image Saul Wold
2012-09-05 21:38 ` Tom Zanussi
2012-09-05 21:38 ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] Meta-tlk update Tom Zanussi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-04 20:57 [PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto: Update linux-yocto for 3.2 and 3.4 Saul Wold
2012-09-04 21:00 ` Martin Jansa
2012-09-05 4:18 ` Saul Wold
2012-09-05 19:45 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMKF1sqyfTS=yZh0CFut1zQMqFawzDaM0XsPmMex239Z5OwZwQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.