From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qt1-f179.google.com (mail-qt1-f179.google.com [209.85.160.179]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.163.1602007036180493287 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 10:57:16 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=h3Epc2HH; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.160.179, mailfrom: raj.khem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-f179.google.com with SMTP id c23so6636520qtp.0 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 10:57:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OMu0KwLXGtPI0japFC5AuGcpLuTqQhjM72AqH2HAHrg=; b=h3Epc2HHBaD4IO1w6Yp/H+CsiMT3uqtk0mOsCxgz50VJOSEkIvLvK9SDXKXlQmFSbM i22z9xq2gm+ZZuo8+OdJIqfDxCG46l72fn0Z03PbhyAJ04piif1ZUcQX21AyNO2wLMeP Snkt12jFHOybsolBNzDYhoFoxlT3z9PDl6bKE8/6ASy8anYhGKFkxQ9Wva8siEBm3kEZ olMtQfcmk5jSxbunpwfH8DKD0IoJ2gMqIEcEcs7JkrUAnUfZDLOOLd2vXEjhj2IE8hDi psXWyODHSSBwnRNbrbP+rGOXnKbbCbYbbCFVgbImktt6sNlI/Fg/a0LXnghoStqIqnMk xHpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OMu0KwLXGtPI0japFC5AuGcpLuTqQhjM72AqH2HAHrg=; b=s/xG4u94JG9nwRJvTD5TIvsTi2FpVYFircpPpOjnfSIAOcjWvV/ZtbJ8XWkWKFrq+e 1n43JO/Qweau7OCmywU4uhF8zSWdcwDmgKX1Qk6LuWb7PrqV/JalCBl8et5Wej9CGBA+ kqD5ZML6KVOaapWAvgozXN5+/0itMBp/OrLDfVPvZvGirxJ4JLSHblIOb5lfys0t9xgG o8BxqMemw55Qdl257fIYynz2svnfsdJ0+vrc/yfimMdgvL6bX91Bep8XU5/ffK/Se2zp cQF4w0iDbjD/kH9kfLUQM+K5bGLXvH20JzDjIyNXXq92YsbN/Fz8eWWtI/+cEaoVUnzs JrOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531J0tKurDFlZW4v5DEhcB4a/kSbtmf9N30vovj5P2MWhbjAU+Wb xicjjPFlDwHMf6mtgI5QzCz2MrAxpGd6WCxAt00= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxGPRr+xj+C+ii06CKG1UYTP2HHR4R/1GrFUvo3ijgpppI0jOQ0b+gTBldEfYEX8mvz+1/GsmT/tXccaGSpkY= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3975:: with SMTP id t50mr6436618qtb.53.1602007035135; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 10:57:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <10765.1602004777092046892@lists.openembedded.org> In-Reply-To: <10765.1602004777092046892@lists.openembedded.org> From: "Khem Raj" Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 10:56:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [oe] wireguard-module broken in dunfell To: veilleux.cedric@gmail.com Cc: openembeded-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable does adding RPROVIDES_kernel-module-${MODULE_NAME} =3D "${PN}" help ? On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 10:19 AM wrote: > > I had the same issue and could not figure out what broke the wireguard-m= odule package. > > I had to resort to bissecting changes in meta-yocto. > > I finally isolated the change that breaks wireguard-module: > > 87c9d29635 package: get_package_mapping: avoid dependency mapping if ren= amed package provides original name > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=3D87c9d2963576= 38082f5a7131a87365285fc813c4 > > It seems the package renaming that wireguard-module does (PKG_${PN} =3D = "kernel-module-${MODULE_NAME}") no longer works after the above commit. > > At this point I do not understand the change regarding renamed package n= ames and dependencies enough to recommend the appropriate fix to wireguard-= module. I have been able to workaround the issue by renaming the package ke= rnel-module-wireguard and thus avoiding the rename altogether. >=20 >