From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944967123A for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l13so145758iga.5 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:22:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=QbPBzCEu4jrWRO2X93q18XgH6rLD+2IY1bk/v4hv97U=; b=gzI9XJdryYhzR4VEf2vMq4x/2kFn9oXARfogxd6sRMFqSMC4KuZAMARzVjJMtiT10p t5Ifu3wCmGRqZ4ioTQFakBDsIq7L3U2RTr7a5PNHn+OJrySPiK4fvtxxhslMKbpQJWhJ 3QkYNd34/n4RfaU0GQk8kEGUrZd085PjM8Bxr0EyHjedCJY6iLOpXFl5b8eOObNYIBI5 pw3xpAmYUVM0RgxtWQJs4N1O7+lgsdoagbcWkvl4vYTJhe/WVcbqO2pRZpc6B0XAocIa YiOjqhkoLtDpNsD5QpjU+YD9dvRwaZZpRA50FEmcPJNYSAy+sDsF6Qap5lvXZ+v4EJQ8 sL9A== X-Received: by 10.42.62.6 with SMTP id w6mr48434915ich.24.1410380531090; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:22:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.102.67 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:21:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Khem Raj Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:21:41 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Burton, Ross" Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: Patchwork cleanup X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:22:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > I've started running the patchwork post-receive hook manually and > marking as submitted many patches in the queue, but as there's 132 > patches of patches still (down from 140-odd!) in an attempt to restore > sanity to the oe-core I think we should just mark as obsolete every > patch that was submitted before a cutoff date, say 1st January 2014. > Any thoughts? As much as I'd love to ensure we didn't drop an > excellent patch from 2012, I'm not going to manually check all the > patches that the tool can't find automatically... I think its ok. Thanks for doing it.