From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBA06E786 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id at1so3424174iec.6 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:44:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2R3i7qE3liZ5cTyQWCcMGQCta+WDAfVEAAbwYEpiM38=; b=Xetu7QBnXIpyvPXSn24dHpCoVni3Y7UefS9cDuiIKQIYhBAdNDrR845m8SVRzvrYpF mjeQewvQTkKWaJFs02wdmoihBt3YQEYVafzAaiWAm8Yp8DOJGcSJOKQQ7ydXbiJGat4B 2S4jgtE0psl48AY6HvvMXZpY2jvtjiHWa6y9xD7jcYRPJf5dIanBUr7yDrUddb0QqUGx V0oTBlW3UnsU+2xc9zdGE89D/JK1r8b3DltgC0FusHG1+bK80x9A7E4KQ4AYyOs4zecD bSRh/B4dj/5ezef/EcTuQKxixrDCnk6228HQZFFY+U+Ub/uAv37rvUuxK5mIPG1Uzke8 GzDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.20.100 with SMTP id m4mr18573731ige.17.1392677098429; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:44:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.224.137 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:44:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.224.137 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:44:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:44:58 -0800 Message-ID: From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.12 Cc: Andre McCurdy Subject: Re: [meta-qt5] why does Qt5 build with ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm" X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:44:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -Khem On Feb 17, 2014 1:28 PM, "Nicolas Dechesne" wrote: > > hi, > > does anybody know why in Qt5/qtbase.inc, we have: > > ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm" there were issues with thumb1 and i guess legacy continued may be its not needed any longer test it out and send a patch make sure that when its using thumb1 then current logic still kicks in > > Could it be an a low hanging fruit from the past? e.g. before > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-16402 or > https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/commit/a3bd9d4c0f3d9e80dbe35bd88649b245dca5f410 ? > > as a matter of fact, for our project Qt5 (and QtWebkit) are building > (and working fine) when built with Thumb2, outside of OE. Also using > ARM instruction set instead of Thumb2 enforces Webkit to use the ARM > version of the javascript JIT, while the Thumb2 JIT engine seems to > work a lot better in our testing... > > cheers > > nico > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel