From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f194.google.com (mail-qk0-f194.google.com [209.85.220.194]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70DCF60119 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 20:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f194.google.com with SMTP id 82so11811125qko.1 for ; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 13:55:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Hn7bEAC26WQ2DDIP9U8n0FsflxX4pcsCeI7Qevok4mk=; b=RH+RzYn80vwmzU6MUQgiiOSfGl3c4YdDIU4TjgXRLcIsBuuRVqCAEKSkVeh9cHx27M X2ztLkNr2sOXkAZtGY7N7SB2b1d/U8qZpFPWSMldWcSVR8C8+6ePENJTVzeSyAdtjF9t 2zVYv5qrO2mDJctqn7ybQRt/0nt2nZ8wkIgvAD8p327QQd+gRvdR0y0hdfQfWBXAz45E qaPfZ7ntN3eEQY+xfW6jHv68pp+4h/5it+IvtdolLSLClxkUS+JDS0wKbA6ghQeiR55V 4wCSh4zVvD8cPbuA/IcsgXDRLmooxa7K6JVPaXRwlEXXUfMPcq/VhwbX8EC6eHhYSU+/ PrNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Hn7bEAC26WQ2DDIP9U8n0FsflxX4pcsCeI7Qevok4mk=; b=CcsUsg/W8C1GCghqBD0/oJsgKZQ9YrenXgjXCjZGOtn4nQIPreDyYuwWNykm21Jbzx myIJlzckQIVZbe+ZffgBSIH+4XdA3pogk4ESGyiLHilFopo/wyF85RXw8fntbb4x9PjC cAZV5GagF/hBbjfkbq3lg6ys+TiNl53lUcQqhaD5wQkWTzGTpaMMG1sGYuewJaY87ma6 n/hmkUDL8rXBuinQ0oEUlQH3zy+iqzpX1/qH/w8HGloxeoLy5xLPM/JnLGIGoyG+kBIb tLopqAxTfRgL89GGNHIAPQFyGfCJv/5ASslwJh7COuA2tAa/TvtPutFddxVMFR1ej3O2 gsJw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJg5TTXXODWyYfsRPB+EFavz6+hIPyxH1MpZGtsYyLcaUJLrQlCHNVIkz5AW9neOYvcE27ZUdk2SlxKOA== X-Received: by 10.55.178.195 with SMTP id b186mr9447668qkf.81.1468011347514; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 13:55:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.214.83 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:55:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160702081927.7365-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> <20160707053905.GA28068@openSUSE-i7.site> <20160707200510.GA4311@openSUSE-i7.site> From: Khem Raj Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:55:18 -0700 Message-ID: To: Trevor Woerner Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] glibc: Upgrade to latest tip of master X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 20:55:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Trevor On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > Ok thanks. Let me know if you get to see the same issue on say qemuarm or > qemuarm64 I built core-image-sato/qemux86-64 vmdk with chromium added CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL_append = " chromium " launched this image in VM and chromium starts normally. I am using github.com/kraj/openembedded-core kraj/master branch and github.com/kraj/meta-raspberrypi kraj/master everything else is upstream master and gcc is 5.x here is my build info Build Configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.31.0" BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" NATIVELSBSTRING = "universal" TARGET_SYS = "x86_64-oe-linux" MACHINE = "qemux86-64" DISTRO = "nodistro" DISTRO_VERSION = "nodistro.0" TUNE_FEATURES = "m64 core2" TARGET_FPU = "" meta-raspberrypi = "kraj/master:b9ba221e520f39bc3e273f709b5ceea02897d525" meta-qcom = "master:0eaea003cac6c3175b0a3682efd6e1f20ecc9dab" meta-96boards = "master:6b2744bf3e82154a9329ab89cf03eec9d1f80837" oe-meta-go = "master:dc19a245ae5224d1c9859119a9c53b6331812400" meta-browser = "master:77736988073a5d90fcff9d0005c8477332ede387" meta-metrological = "kraj/master:356f0c33298eb63af415f333fe06121d056261e1" meta-multimedia meta-gnome meta-oe = "master:f11f8664de82e4f8c23b075542f4c98c16ce1f5e" meta = "kraj/master:96ed9e94082589a62a6c602e5f774c11de3328c6" > > > On Jul 7, 2016 1:04 PM, "Trevor Woerner" wrote: >> >> On Thu 2016-07-07 @ 09:27:30 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> > Is it specific to x86-64 >> >> Up to this point I've only been focused on x86-64, but now that I have >> things >> cleared up on that arch, I'll be working on aarch64 to see how that goes. >> >> My "solution" for the time-being is to simply pull in the glibc_2.23 >> recipes >> into my build and set GLIBCVERSION to match. At some point I'll be trying >> to >> bisect the glibc commits themselves to see if I can find anything >> conclusive >> (but, as always, that'll take some time).