All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] defaultsetup.conf: Enable security flags+pie by default
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:26:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMKF1srwY--+D5fyj-TF-PYjbkvBTTjCPv=mVtZMim6vYHy8pg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <084d0ef1bd4047859ed68d8e90d3321d@XBOX02.axis.com>

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:49 PM Peter Kjellerstedt
<peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org <openembedded-
> > core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Khem Raj
> > Sent: den 24 juli 2018 16:12
> > To: ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> > Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer <openembedded-
> > core@lists.openembedded.org>
> > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] defaultsetup.conf: Enable security
> > flags+pie by default
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:30 AM ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Khem,
> > >
> > > The comments in security-flags.inc also needs to be modified to
> > remove
> > > 'poky-lsb' info.
> > >
> > > I'd suggest we still put it into distro conf file (poky.conf) instead
> > of
> > > defaultsetup.conf, because defaultsetup.conf is included by
> > > bitbake.conf. I think things in defaultsetup.conf should be necessary
> > > default values to build things out. I don't think security flags is
> > > necessary to build things out.
> >
> > this is the default setup, even non-poky users will get consistent
> > experience.
>
> I have to agree with Chen here. I think requiring security_flags.inc from
> defaultsetup.conf is the wrong thing to do. We use security_flags.inc in
> our setup, and I know how much trouble it has brought. To me, using it
> should be a distro decision, not something that is enforced by the use
> of bitbake.

Thats fine, I can move this to poky distro settings, using it by
default would have
been in sync for all since reference distro is using it would be
easier for others when
submitting patches, as a phase 2 I was also thinking of defaulting to
hardeing in the toolchain itself
and remove this file completely that would have made it much better,
then folks who dont want hardeing could just disable
it in toolchain. but I am fine to leave it a distro decision for now.

>
> > > Also, I got a question when I just looked at this file.
> > > Do you think we should adjust CFLAGS and LDFALGS in security_flags.inc
> > > instead of the current TARGET_CC_ARCH and TARGET_LDFLAGS?
> >
> > in many cases packages do not honor CFLAGS/LDFLAGS say during configure
> >
> > > We are naming
> > > variables to SECURITY_CFLAGS and SECURITY_LDFLAGS, it seems that they
> > > belong to CFLAGS and LDFLAGS naturally. But I'm not sure about it.
> > >
> > yes they do, but this makes it easy to override the setting for
> > packages where these options are needed to be overridden or modified.
>
> Actually, with the changes introduced in Pyro, SECURITY_CFLAGS became a
> mess. Before Pyro, you either set SECURITY_CFLAGS to
> "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" (to disable the use of -fpie), or you set it
> to the empty string (to disable all security options). With Pyro and later,
> you instead have to set SECURITY_CFLAGS to "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}
> ${SECURITY_NOPIE_CFLAGS}" to make sure -fpie is disabled, or set it to
> "${SECURITY_NOPIE_CFLAGS}" to disable everything. Alternatively you can
> set SECURITY_PIE_CFLAGS to "${SECURITY_NOPIE_CFLAGS}" to only disable
> -fpie.
>
> I have considered to suggest changing the definition of
> SECURITY_NOPIE_CFLAGS to:
>
> SECURITY_NOPIE_CFLAGS ?= "${@'-no-pie -fno-PIE' if '${GCCPIE}' else ''}"
>
> and then change SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS to:
>
> SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-strong ${SECURITY_NOPIE_CFLAGS} ${lcl_maybe_fortify} ${SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT}"
>
> That would better have matched the situation before Pyro, in that one yet
> again would set SECURITY_CFLAGS to "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" to disable
> -fpie. Unfortunately one would still have to set SECURITY_CFLAGS to
> "${SECURITY_NOPIE_CFLAGS}" to disable everything.
>
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Chen Qi
> > >
> > >
> > > On 07/24/2018 03:09 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > > This has been an opt-in for so long, some distributions e.g.
> > > > poky-lsb uses it by default however, since most of linux
> > > > distros have started to default to these settings for security
> > > > enhancements, time has come for OE to make it default too
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   meta/conf/distro/defaultsetup.conf | 1 +
> > > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/defaultsetup.conf
> > b/meta/conf/distro/defaultsetup.conf
> > > > index ca2f9178d2..352e279596 100644
> > > > --- a/meta/conf/distro/defaultsetup.conf
> > > > +++ b/meta/conf/distro/defaultsetup.conf
> > > > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > > >   include conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
> > > >   include conf/distro/include/default-versions.inc
> > > >   include conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc
> > > > +require conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
> > > >   include conf/distro/include/world-broken.inc
> > > >
> > > >   TCMODE ?= "default"
>
> //Peter
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-27 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-23 19:09 [PATCH] defaultsetup.conf: Enable security flags+pie by default Khem Raj
2018-07-24  6:42 ` Anuj Mittal
2018-07-24 14:13   ` Khem Raj
2018-07-24  7:34 ` ChenQi
2018-07-24 14:12   ` Khem Raj
2018-07-27 20:49     ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2018-07-27 21:05       ` Andre McCurdy
2018-07-27 21:26       ` Khem Raj [this message]
2018-07-31 21:17         ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2018-08-02  9:26           ` Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMKF1srwY--+D5fyj-TF-PYjbkvBTTjCPv=mVtZMim6vYHy8pg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.