From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuri Weinstein Subject: Re: Jewel 10.2.7 QE status Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:55:55 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com ([209.85.128.170]:35097 "EHLO mail-wr0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751881AbdDEVz5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17:55:57 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f170.google.com with SMTP id o21so6755037wrb.2 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 14:55:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Development, Ceph" There had been lengthy discussion in #ceph-devel regarding failed upgrade tests, https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/pull/1055, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19429 We need to decide what to do about this in context of this release. On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19055#note-13 > The following suites were in scope of this point release validation: > > rados (subset 35/50 227 jobceph-ansibles) > rbd > rgw > fs > krbd > kcephfs > knfs > rest > hadoop - EXCLUDED > samba - EXCLUDED > ceph-deploy > ceph-disk > upgrade/client-upgrade > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) > upgrade/jewel-x/point-to-point-x > powercycle > ceph-ansible > > (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list) > > ===================== > Outstanding issues > > rados - two jobs failed, need Josh's approval > krbd - seems similar to previous release, need Ilya's approval > > upgrade/client-upgrade > and > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - suspect > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19429, need Sage/Josh approve > > Thx > YuriW