From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:33050 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754689Ab2DPULJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:11:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120416162710.GA24100@kroah.com> References: <20120412011313.GA23764@kroah.com> <20120412144626.GA14868@kroah.com> <20120413105746.10ffb120@stein> <20120413190819.9469.qmail@stuge.se> <20120416162710.GA24100@kroah.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:11:05 +0300 Message-ID: (sfid-20120416_221128_312498_24107098) Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review From: Felipe Contreras To: Greg KH Cc: Stefan Richter , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , linux-wireless Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Greg KH wrote: > Just one minor correction in this looney email thread: > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:53:22AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> v3.3.x on the other hand are *not* stable. They contain patches >> backported from v3.4, but nobody guarantees they will work. There was >> no v3.3.1-rc1, so the first time the patches compromising v3.3.1 were >> generally tested together is in v3.3.1, at which point if somebody >> finds issues, it's too late; bad patches are *not* going to be removed >> in v3.3.2. > > Of course there was a 3.3.1-rc1, see the linux-kernel archives for the > announcemen and the individual patches.  kernel.org has the large patch > itself if you like that format instead. I don't see it here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=tags If you really want people to try it, why not tag it? -- Felipe Contreras From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:11:05 +0300 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review In-Reply-To: <20120416162710.GA24100@kroah.com> References: <20120412011313.GA23764@kroah.com> <20120412144626.GA14868@kroah.com> <20120413105746.10ffb120@stein> <20120413190819.9469.qmail@stuge.se> <20120416162710.GA24100@kroah.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Greg KH wrote: > Just one minor correction in this looney email thread: > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:53:22AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> v3.3.x on the other hand are *not* stable. They contain patches >> backported from v3.4, but nobody guarantees they will work. There was >> no v3.3.1-rc1, so the first time the patches compromising v3.3.1 were >> generally tested together is in v3.3.1, at which point if somebody >> finds issues, it's too late; bad patches are *not* going to be removed >> in v3.3.2. > > Of course there was a 3.3.1-rc1, see the linux-kernel archives for the > announcemen and the individual patches. ?kernel.org has the large patch > itself if you like that format instead. I don't see it here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=tags If you really want people to try it, why not tag it? -- Felipe Contreras