From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756242Ab3GYOAn (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:00:43 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:57117 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755664Ab3GYOAj (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:00:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1EC23D2B9975384993D85B5DB93AAE8861B641@sisaex01sj> References: <1373944014.17876.255.camel@gandalf.local.home> <51E4BFA9.1030600@zytor.com> <1373991399.6458.6.camel@gandalf.local.home> <51E59F79.1040903@zytor.com> <20130717144043.GA16513@xanatos> <20130719120841.GH26716@gmail.com> <1EC23D2B9975384993D85B5DB93AAE8861AA8D@sisaex01sj> <1EC23D2B9975384993D85B5DB93AAE8861B641@sisaex01sj> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:00:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] How to act on LKML From: Felipe Contreras To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , "ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Stefano Stabellini , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Darren Hart , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Willy Tarreau , stable , Chris Ball , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On 07/24/2013 12:51 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> Your mistaken fallacy seems to be that you think one can *always* be >> both A (open and honest), and B (polite)... > > You are are right, I do think that you can *always* be both open and > honest, and polite. I do not believe that I am mistaken. And I hope that > you will come to agree with me in the not too distant future. What I come to agree is irrelevant. What you _hope_ is not important. What you _believe_ doesn't really matter. You've stated what you *think*, that barely has any value in the discussion, but all right, you've done so already... duly noted. Moving on. What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. -- Felipe Contreras From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1EC23D2B9975384993D85B5DB93AAE8861B641@sisaex01sj> References: <1373944014.17876.255.camel@gandalf.local.home> <51E4BFA9.1030600@zytor.com> <1373991399.6458.6.camel@gandalf.local.home> <51E59F79.1040903@zytor.com> <20130717144043.GA16513@xanatos> <20130719120841.GH26716@gmail.com> <1EC23D2B9975384993D85B5DB93AAE8861AA8D@sisaex01sj> <1EC23D2B9975384993D85B5DB93AAE8861B641@sisaex01sj> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:00:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] How to act on LKML From: Felipe Contreras To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , "ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Stefano Stabellini , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Darren Hart , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Willy Tarreau , stable , Chris Ball , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On 07/24/2013 12:51 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> Your mistaken fallacy seems to be that you think one can *always* be >> both A (open and honest), and B (polite)... > > You are are right, I do think that you can *always* be both open and > honest, and polite. I do not believe that I am mistaken. And I hope that > you will come to agree with me in the not too distant future. What I come to agree is irrelevant. What you _hope_ is not important. What you _believe_ doesn't really matter. You've stated what you *think*, that barely has any value in the discussion, but all right, you've done so already... duly noted. Moving on. What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. -- Felipe Contreras