From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756700Ab3GQRQE (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:16:04 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:36774 "EHLO mail-la0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754907Ab3GQRQB (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:16:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20130715204135.GH15531@xanatos> <20130716211235.GG4994@xanatos> <20130716212704.GB9371@thunk.org> <20130716224357.GK4994@xanatos> <1374015299.6458.76.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130716231217.GL4994@xanatos> <51E5D7C8.5000306@gmail.com> <1374018809.2249.29.camel@leira.trondhjem.org> <1000066089.1803398.1374046596236.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <20130717144849.GB16513@xanatos> <1374073771.6458.143.camel@gandalf.local.home> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:15:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] How to act on LKML From: Felipe Contreras To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Steven Rostedt , Sarah Sharp , CAI Qian , David Lang , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Darren Hart , Olivier Galibert , stable , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Willy Tarreau , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> The last thing I want to do is to lower the quality of the kernel just >> to get a wider range of developers. > > Can we stop bringing the quality of the code into the discussion? Can you please stop calling open communication abuse? First you have to explain *why* it was improper in order to call it abuse, and in the few examples that have been shown, it has been explained that the behavior was justified (breaking the #1 rule by a lieutenant who should know better). > I think it's pretty clear that one doesn't need to be verbally abusive > in order to stop bad code from getting into the kernel. You can think whatever you want, others have already shown that changing the tone of the message in the examples would have changed the desired effect. -- Felipe Contreras