Hi,

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:55:53PM +0300, Fancer's opinion wrote:
> Hello, folks
> Regarding the no_bootmem patchset I've sent earlier.
> I'm terribly sorry about huge delay with response. I got sucked in a new
> project, so just didn't have a time to proceed with the series, answer to the
> questions and resend the set.
> If it is still relevant and needed for community, I can get back to the series
> on the next week, answer to the Mett's questions (sorry, man, for doing it so
> long), rebase it on top of the kernel 4.18 and resend the new version. We also
> can try to combine it with this patch, if it is found convenient.

So, what would be the best way to move forward?

> Regards,
> -Sergey
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, 20:20 Paul Burton, <paul.burton@mips.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi Mike,
>
>     On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03:56AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>     > Any comments on this?
>
>     I haven't looked at this in detail yet, but there was a much larger
>     series submitted to accomplish this not too long ago, which needed
>     another revision:
>
>         https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/project/linux-mips/list/?series=787&
>     state=*
>
>     Given that, I'd be (pleasantly) surprised if this one smaller patch is
>     enough.
>
>     Thanks,
>         Paul
>

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.