From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6166e140-b417-dd22-10cf-843db3958226@lechnology.com> References: <20180327092031.11251-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <6166e140-b417-dd22-10cf-843db3958226@lechnology.com> From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:07:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To: David Lechner Cc: Sekhar Nori , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Philipp Zabel , Linux ARM , devicetree , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski List-ID: 2018-03-27 18:48 GMT+02:00 David Lechner : > Wasn't there a v4 already? Is this really v5 instead of v3? > Yes there was and Philipp applied the v4 alright. > > On 03/27/2018 04:20 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >> >> This series converts the only user of the handcoded, mach-specific reset >> routines in the davinci platform to using the reset framework. >> >> Patches 1-3 add necessary lookups/DT-properties. > > > Should I just squash the DT changes into my common-clock-v9 branch > since those patches haven't been picked up yet anyway? That will be > 2 fewer patches to keep track of. I would personally prefer to keep the changesets thematically separate. The clock series is big anyway already. Thanks, Bartosz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: brgl@bgdev.pl (Bartosz Golaszewski) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:07:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework In-Reply-To: <6166e140-b417-dd22-10cf-843db3958226@lechnology.com> References: <20180327092031.11251-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <6166e140-b417-dd22-10cf-843db3958226@lechnology.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org 2018-03-27 18:48 GMT+02:00 David Lechner : > Wasn't there a v4 already? Is this really v5 instead of v3? > Yes there was and Philipp applied the v4 alright. > > On 03/27/2018 04:20 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >> >> This series converts the only user of the handcoded, mach-specific reset >> routines in the davinci platform to using the reset framework. >> >> Patches 1-3 add necessary lookups/DT-properties. > > > Should I just squash the DT changes into my common-clock-v9 branch > since those patches haven't been picked up yet anyway? That will be > 2 fewer patches to keep track of. I would personally prefer to keep the changesets thematically separate. The clock series is big anyway already. Thanks, Bartosz