From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F2FC43334 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 15:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-f41.google.com (mail-ed1-f41.google.com [209.85.208.41]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.33607.1654529786185055169 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 08:36:26 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bgdev-pl.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=UrJa/DVn; spf=none, err=SPF record not found (domain: bgdev.pl, ip: 209.85.208.41, mailfrom: brgl@bgdev.pl) Received: by mail-ed1-f41.google.com with SMTP id w27so19315028edl.7 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 08:36:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bgdev-pl.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=S+J4AmK2pxja40vBDBKTwSIl2QYvzVRAgTQkSHK8Rk8=; b=UrJa/DVnhuJAqqIVmfVYRGd1wI1GBPuG2AbSdvKTLJHUnfO64TTnaUSbcaJPBPnjEa O95rFEpbp4Ly4dOQvkDUqEGZzLkJrCX97tLQZvTikesvcj4aANJpyOtSAlhHXSThB7Cr 2d/RJk4f+Lp1zDIe22zmcze6P4psxkmhrFBj4MwLBMUTmBypD0LUGRbVsyHpPbFWw2q2 Ay+FARUgHQqcgJShNufraOn/z+ls82SHH07I26b+hEIVs92rrswqEZuTtLvkGoVoDfAE HzckAw6rT98zsI/ojOrU4GjQWJAgHp9mkiIVW9uhFYiEOPc9xuHzEUIxtGmpLf4lM7Ko Uv5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S+J4AmK2pxja40vBDBKTwSIl2QYvzVRAgTQkSHK8Rk8=; b=1I9yU7usZ/A3fRBz2HCi97N155ioMnacyGDaivvfxe/EcQ7huxbX2c/JiM+dGaOlXD KmyMqiL2zMWe0mpCRjBGexJ1OKcwxh6haSY9dlBQcbcucq+YkF+DTau7lEqtXb5NHQYh 7qCmv5zOzgEh94A+3udTfpQiMyERKNF5C1CtW9zSLFqyLHGPJdty7UDSyJ5M3WgtKJOm Pfgviuwc3kBOr6OBhS7mTgorUbF2K/JC5vG3l+tbKiedCLGf0BmlYCW6gsp0GlI6e9Zu 3T6aTSH0gR+clgRGd94dFi3Lw1jANqyRkNb2F39OD8KOT4v3X7jifofg7rAcySJwx54v 6Org== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NJYu12UREuQAWKrGWbApuJ1ZawajIRVGmnK/3BQi/MojDrAhe ufFnBhbEuPxe6z/fTWlhVgUwT17cbPkd2iHdbvnfEw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiS9YwfKLygL99SaabgGK5l50M2zQMfI+9zu1DfOfmkgbVRwgukJpQPMO5hBZ2WcRPKkqBxLNPgPN2jX8KbrM= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d8d8:0:b0:42d:dbb0:f05b with SMTP id k24-20020aa7d8d8000000b0042ddbb0f05bmr27630164eds.82.1654529784260; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 08:36:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220606132653.60232-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20220606132653.60232-5-brgl@bgdev.pl> In-Reply-To: From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 17:36:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH 4/4] gstreamer1.0-plugins-rs: new package To: Alexander Kanavin Cc: Khem Raj , OE-core Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 15:36:35 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/166650 On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 5:23 PM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > Thanks; is this something that oe-core needs to provide? As it's not > in version lockstep with the rest of gstreamer, it seems more like a > collection of experimental plugins and is maybe a better fit for > meta-oe for now? > Fine with me but the first three patches need to go into oe-core anyway so I'd like to hear some feedback and then this one can be put into meta-oe. Bart