From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Coombs Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] ARM: Kirkwood: Use DT to configure SATA device. Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:52:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1341325365-21393-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <1341325365-21393-12-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1341325365-21393-12-git-send-email-andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Jason Cooper , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org, Michael Walle , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > Convert boards using DT, but the old way of configuring SATA to now > use properties in there DT file. Andrew, should I be updating my GoFlex patch set to work with these new Kirkwood DT abstractions, and if so is there a specific tree you'd prefer I work against, or should I wait to see if my existing patch set is approved as is and update with a new patch once these updates land in an RC? Josh Coombs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: josh.coombs@gmail.com (Josh Coombs) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:52:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2 11/12] ARM: Kirkwood: Use DT to configure SATA device. In-Reply-To: <1341325365-21393-12-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> References: <1341325365-21393-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <1341325365-21393-12-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > Convert boards using DT, but the old way of configuring SATA to now > use properties in there DT file. Andrew, should I be updating my GoFlex patch set to work with these new Kirkwood DT abstractions, and if so is there a specific tree you'd prefer I work against, or should I wait to see if my existing patch set is approved as is and update with a new patch once these updates land in an RC? Josh Coombs