From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:44:59 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1483985224.21472.3.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <20170109.135259.988711786570465428.davem@davemloft.net> <20170110.131223.748150430551443881.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Eric Dumazet , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Linux Kernel Network Developers To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.220.193]:36518 "EHLO mail-qk0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934153AbdAJSp0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:45:26 -0500 Received: by mail-qk0-f193.google.com with SMTP id a20so24998016qkc.3 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:45:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170110.131223.748150430551443881.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:12 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Cong Wang > Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:06:01 -0800 > >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Eric Dumazet >>> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:07:04 -0800 >>> >>>> You really should come to netdev conferences so that you understand >>>> goals and efforts, instead of living in your cave. >>> >>> I completely agree with Eric. >>> >>> Cong we have a very serious problem with you exactly because you make >>> quite vicious emotional statements targetted at other developers >>> merely when they say something you disagree with. >> >> What emotional? Pointing out Eris's words from 4 years ago is NOT >> emotional, it is just a help. > > Saying "Facepalm" is emotional and has nothing to do with the > technical issues. Facepalm is heavily used on Internet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facepalm#Internet_usage it is how people including me react to disappointing. It is those who only see facepalm make it irrelevant to the technical discussion in this thread. > > You can keep showing us how expertly you can deflect the real > issue we are discussion here, but that won't improve the situation > at all I am afraid. Of course, there are just too many people too lazy to do a google search: https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2013/05/msg00500.html > >> Not everyone is as free to travel to Canada without a visa as you, >> unfortunately. > > We hold netdev in other countries all over the world, stop making > excuses. The only countries you hold netdev are Canada, Japan and Spain (to my knowledge). If you check: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_requirements_for_Chinese_citizens#Visa_requirements It is very easy to find out if it is an excuse or a fact.