From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395AFC433DF for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 19:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED14C2067D for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 19:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FoQIaiJ3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726759AbgF3TCy (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:02:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39332 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726055AbgF3TCx (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:02:53 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x142.google.com (mail-il1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800D7C061755 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x142.google.com with SMTP id r12so11523699ilh.4 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:02:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XspkxVwnCCMzj9hgy6TK9qT2xMitwCQCc7943oYVtDY=; b=FoQIaiJ3NT13TeSUKuHlr0zi7y/xj6JXzqfVEkrjhwxmtzC9l/xaqwuX9Aboke7qY5 nM7Ojf5z2+UPTZbNiZBJmW/U9JQwBW9tNfQmptV2Ug/YKODN22BbN4gJV12IRcK2P18e xn9DnkLk2WjiQnu0XOTOJM6wvY8WWuTsRsEcXbwfG1AGeybxoyIZ3D8sUKowHyGvSiw+ bmyzteJ+BpuZcfZG9cuPYyKPNhoppA7NV1rpDEtkAxFoOS/uYv/vyCR0f6JCUlJuNHzr tiU1PrQVS6NNZPF0BH5mogSv13dfdEV+iUWEQeidyDpsW19mQjvtnX3THPOu2UHBVJPE Vgiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XspkxVwnCCMzj9hgy6TK9qT2xMitwCQCc7943oYVtDY=; b=M/PXvvfhD11IFMxxmp4QC9Dcym0d/vkhe4ong6L2CE+8n9uJxthhgfk870DEK19SkN FP+cPg8t1G+KneqUvJajZK7fEWfcmCNuwkdCAWYvMqfv4ibmVt0IyZGlWcwZ6P1D7pHn 4yL3jrxDQXwEbaoBZwYzrNegqLFgUrTajLl+eB0M0NscT6Fj+Q32JDwxOEBdgChichkO 6w2inyKqs4kFt5NV1eLkaCGt2b+vilGM8Ahsoh90wmmC+p8riLH3KnOovSfGAsLqyTQ+ CKC8FZz9hPGOjDIUMUQ3F6Mbs+9q+o8/C2qAwz6/dgGwEmkquWXVLx/78xy/EKkI+Qwv yqjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305ZaM2fg0ayFo00KVniIHxjkXt9zS3TypmKYEvw5u7vDsgxCsh SfHeDZTyXVYULDVJCxDfcTXjWWcvFhw5+KJ6Dog4Ge9r X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLR03sniJGZMbdU8jiyE72wleUlMupCX7fnjbsYBHAsyiB+Esr6SWAoZUSEwDSPzYC35yFjSTE415WeKwxWZ4= X-Received: by 2002:a92:b655:: with SMTP id s82mr4227030ili.268.1593543770817; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:02:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1593485646-14989-1-git-send-email-wenxu@ucloud.cn> In-Reply-To: <1593485646-14989-1-git-send-email-wenxu@ucloud.cn> From: Cong Wang Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:02:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: act_mirred: fix fragment the packet after defrag in act_ct To: wenxu Cc: Paul Blakey , Linux Kernel Network Developers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:55 PM wrote: > > From: wenxu > > The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet > over the mtu in the act_mirred. This big packet should be fragmented > to send out. This is too brief. Why act_mirred should handle the burden introduced by act_ct? And why is this 158-line change targeting -net not -net-next? Thanks.