From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v3 0/3] net_sched: reflect tx_queue_len change
 for pfifo_fast
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:12:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVgDYhDhU7rQ2TmBK2Nn3_nHF3wJBWy7ceQnb+imCG_ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180126022624.20442-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <20180129.124324.1307163515349322323.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:38117 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752302AbeA3ANQ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 29 Jan 2018 19:13:16 -0500
Received: by mail-pg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id y27so5774369pgc.5
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:13:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20180129.124324.1307163515349322323.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:43 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Please follow up with John about making the queue allocation use
> a prepare + commit phase.

Will do it once net-next is re-open.


>
> And as for the TX queue state handling on change, I think it's
> fine to purge the whole queue.  That is definitely better than
> allowing the queue length to be visibly over the tx_queue_len
> setting.
>

OK. Thanks.