From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] cls_flower: Various fixes
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 09:45:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpX0-kS2aJmPz1XCYvx43YFF3TrSzKx36=G5aW45eo4_6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1527668258-27174-1-git-send-email-paulb@mellanox.com>
 <CAM_iQpWQAwD8kfV4B9EK81TWtY6ZwEUZ_DbdCnC-iF22Ch8mxQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180603193911.GA3013@nanopsycho> <695d484a-b981-054a-1da0-e63719bc9100@mellanox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@mellanox.com>,
        Shahar Klein <shahark@mellanox.com>,
        Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
To: Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:46721 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750931AbeFDQp0 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 12:45:26 -0400
Received: by mail-pf0-f195.google.com with SMTP id q1-v6so1918191pff.13
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 09:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <695d484a-b981-054a-1da0-e63719bc9100@mellanox.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/06/2018 22:39, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>> Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 08:33:25PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Two of the fixes are for my multiple mask patch
>>>>
>>>> Paul Blakey (2):
>>>>    cls_flower: Fix missing free of rhashtable
>>>>    cls_flower: Fix comparing of old filter mask with new filter
>>>
>>>
>>> Both are bug fixes and one-line fixes, so definitely should go
>>> to -net tree and -stable tree.
>>
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>
> it's because the commit they fix doesn't exists in net yet.
>

Oh, sorry, my bad, I thought Apr 30 is in a previous release...

Anyway, v2 should be applied cleanly to -net-next or -net after
net-next is merged into it.