From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755030Ab1G0QhE (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:37:04 -0400 Received: from mail-yi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:33768 "EHLO mail-yi0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754910Ab1G0Qg7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:36:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E2FCE2A.3000909@suse.cz> References: <4E1D9C25.8080300@suse.cz> <1311634718-32588-1-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.cz> <4E2EBF63.8050208@suse.cz> <20110726080443.62196869.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <4E2F0735.1070403@suse.cz> <20110726112824.b357c756.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20110726213536.1f56f0e3.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <4E2FCE2A.3000909@suse.cz> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:36:57 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(), KCONFIG_BUILTIN() and KCONFIG_MODULE() From: =?UTF-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico_Wang?= To: Michal Marek Cc: Randy Dunlap , Arnaud Lacombe , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Michal Marek wrote: > > Good idea. Is anyone against > IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO) > IS_ENABLED_BUILTIN(CONFIG_FOO) > IS_ENABLED_MODULE(CONFIG_FOO) > ? How about IS_ENABLED() IS_BUILTIN() IS_MODULE()? Thanks.