From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 0/9] net: sched: introduce chain templates support with offloading to mlxsw Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:38:04 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20180626080000.12964-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20180628.134826.1129904828597717313.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Jiri Pirko , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Jamal Hadi Salim , Jakub Kicinski , Simon Horman , john.hurley@netronome.com, David Ahern , mlxsw@mellanox.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:39644 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967500AbeF1RiR (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:38:17 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f66.google.com with SMTP id n2-v6so2773572pgq.6 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:38:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180628.134826.1129904828597717313.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:48 PM David Miller wrote: > > This series doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, and also there seems to still > be some discussion about how the iproute2 command line should look. > I am sure you know this, so just to be clear: A redesign of "how iproute2 command line should look" usually means a redesign in the kernel code too. Apparently, 'tc chaintemplate' is a new subsystem under TC, while a 'tc filter template' is merely a new TC filter attribute.