From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Masahiro YAMADA Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 17:00:29 +0900 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/15] arm: kconfig: move board select menus and other settings to SoC dir In-Reply-To: <1407295083-31995-1-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> References: <1407295083-31995-1-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Tom, 2014-08-06 12:17 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > There are lots of boards supported in ARM architecture. > The board select menu in arch/arm/Kconfig is already too fat. > > This series introduces platform select between arch select and > board select. > > ARCH select (ARM) > |-- Platform select > |-- Board select > > Many (not all) of boards have been moved to $(SOC)/Kconfig. > > I built all the boards and confirmed the same binaries are > produced with/without thie series. > > I am including a patch to remove "omap5912osk" board in this series > to avoid conflicts. > > Prerequisites > ------------- > [1] > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/374758/ > to avoid a conflict in drivers/usb/gadget/Makefile > > [2] > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/374416/ > to avoid a conflict in doc/README.scrapyard > > [3] > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/375467/ > to avoid a conflict in configs/jetson-tk1_defconfig > New boards are coming all the time, for example http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/376782/ The problem is this series causes big conflicts with such patches. Because this series was reviewed, acked or tested by some ARM-SoC maintainers, I think this should go directly into u-boot/master asap along with some prerequisites. What do you think? Should we wait for Albert's review? Best Regards Masahiro Yamada