From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED44C433EF for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1352156AbiA2QUD (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2022 11:20:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48802 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242424AbiA2QT6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2022 11:19:58 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C769C061714; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:19:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17EAEB8120C; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A08C2C340E5; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:19:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1643473195; bh=ozMiiYFbCOSr6At7dNUhU0RKoDLf1poblUCMXrvrUTc=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=jNezTp5EJyW5hRYPxZP22DprMQ+MrUgs6k5X7wVUcnRrvkbBcapZl4jD9it8Es7L0 f+14aV7kNknvtHqL7kJfFSAyiOGNcvGeCKry5iXFLyM4pvwnKbsapLiaaIyJm5k6G9 2brdDg9Hxney+o74sQhxEU4yumnIfDJZ/73MOlYklxKGktGH5MrGsjDBAar7EpQNwi gUFvxHh9iJhLH1JqIwmUFzaOa7J/jdgnsSSKu6VspbeQURN7s0gam2EbgF9r37KD5D kztO+8/gB+D8xOQ29G5s1muQ93wxfF4VJyeLdEP3Ho0VofibiZ3LcE7qspR0E338DG 9MFWwOsCHb0IA== Received: by mail-wm1-f43.google.com with SMTP id d138-20020a1c1d90000000b0034e043aaac7so7864562wmd.5; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:19:55 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531D9SMn/eknOR7ugPhOZPk1JFG1UC2k81WzJuNRgc3k0h+DY9Sg 4lbxL20gEzkkVhIBsPFyu+vNqd8WAGHW/gVTcSk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEFC2YpKEZ1hgsY28YircroF5snPOgYrizVAYq4zDTywcro2JwThKl6Oxj03ZEup5kdtiQrwZtqqLM9U47B6c= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f84:: with SMTP id n4mr11799956wmq.106.1643473194017; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:19:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220110210809.3528-1-fllinden@amazon.com> <20220110210809.3528-2-fllinden@amazon.com> <20220124210538.GA15943@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-d7720709.us-west-2.amazon.com> In-Reply-To: <20220124210538.GA15943@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-d7720709.us-west-2.amazon.com> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 17:19:42 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] memblock: define functions to set the usable memory range To: Frank van der Linden Cc: Mike Rapoport , Linux ARM , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Linux Memory Management List , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-efi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Geert Uytterhoeven Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 22:05, Frank van der Linden wrote: > > Meanwhile, it seems that this issue was already addressed in: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211215021348.8766-1-kernelfans@gmail.com/ > > ..which has now been pulled in, and sent to stable@ for 5.15. I > somehow missed that message, and sent my change in a few weeks > later. > > The fix to just reserve the ranges does seem a bit cleaner overall, > but this will do fine. > Works for me. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9706EC433EF for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:21:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=bVl/UpYLo/keGSLg8OEwm9YjyR7ChSWsKfgoXHcDd8I=; b=z1vXr05csgPuwg UBJG/u/ilz/o3ENj/9007eZxeYJx/y5sg5WtmiP57USeQHLWaRXGyvjTfPDJniUanpNgXF6L28rIy Av9iN2WzBIoW0S5ZBQPv+ZOuTMfyXtZlAE00O8iEAbVV8iW+oTAihEX/TzFf3yB42G7FyGseq6X4W 1QOeYsmrWpPEEAABS3MuncnOnVUvv6bwmOJkDEQElBLRO7LH9SvLh5Iq6sw2moPPBy98pGdDPMJ47 wY42s8xmPrFBpABGOZ64tkbCcxnzi/l+EYZe6JduicaZy7IARYZ9io2SZ0ByM2TKDwFYKmK0czZ3O k5G6llxLEg2ICK8et30Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nDqSJ-00543r-6w; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:20:03 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nDqSE-00542U-0m; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:19:59 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C53760EE3; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A553EC36AE3; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:19:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1643473195; bh=ozMiiYFbCOSr6At7dNUhU0RKoDLf1poblUCMXrvrUTc=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=jNezTp5EJyW5hRYPxZP22DprMQ+MrUgs6k5X7wVUcnRrvkbBcapZl4jD9it8Es7L0 f+14aV7kNknvtHqL7kJfFSAyiOGNcvGeCKry5iXFLyM4pvwnKbsapLiaaIyJm5k6G9 2brdDg9Hxney+o74sQhxEU4yumnIfDJZ/73MOlYklxKGktGH5MrGsjDBAar7EpQNwi gUFvxHh9iJhLH1JqIwmUFzaOa7J/jdgnsSSKu6VspbeQURN7s0gam2EbgF9r37KD5D kztO+8/gB+D8xOQ29G5s1muQ93wxfF4VJyeLdEP3Ho0VofibiZ3LcE7qspR0E338DG 9MFWwOsCHb0IA== Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id o1-20020a1c4d01000000b0034d95625e1fso10448143wmh.4; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:19:55 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531A3GtQMCnqZWA+Tp8iwg+OCWguMvOnx63mwNN02SDlppV7E4O9 2kUH6nt0mi22Jfy4HfadmpeX/EGZoZjvLT077qU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEFC2YpKEZ1hgsY28YircroF5snPOgYrizVAYq4zDTywcro2JwThKl6Oxj03ZEup5kdtiQrwZtqqLM9U47B6c= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f84:: with SMTP id n4mr11799956wmq.106.1643473194017; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:19:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220110210809.3528-1-fllinden@amazon.com> <20220110210809.3528-2-fllinden@amazon.com> <20220124210538.GA15943@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-d7720709.us-west-2.amazon.com> In-Reply-To: <20220124210538.GA15943@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-d7720709.us-west-2.amazon.com> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 17:19:42 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] memblock: define functions to set the usable memory range To: Frank van der Linden Cc: Mike Rapoport , Linux ARM , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Linux Memory Management List , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-efi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Geert Uytterhoeven X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220129_081958_146638_446C55EE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.25 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 22:05, Frank van der Linden wrote: > > Meanwhile, it seems that this issue was already addressed in: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211215021348.8766-1-kernelfans@gmail.com/ > > ..which has now been pulled in, and sent to stable@ for 5.15. I > somehow missed that message, and sent my change in a few weeks > later. > > The fix to just reserve the ranges does seem a bit cleaner overall, > but this will do fine. > Works for me. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 17:19:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] memblock: define functions to set the usable memory range In-Reply-To: <20220124210538.GA15943@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-d7720709.us-west-2.amazon.com> References: <20220110210809.3528-1-fllinden@amazon.com> <20220110210809.3528-2-fllinden@amazon.com> <20220124210538.GA15943@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-d7720709.us-west-2.amazon.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kexec@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 22:05, Frank van der Linden wrote: > > Meanwhile, it seems that this issue was already addressed in: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211215021348.8766-1-kernelfans at gmail.com/ > > ..which has now been pulled in, and sent to stable@ for 5.15. I > somehow missed that message, and sent my change in a few weeks > later. > > The fix to just reserve the ranges does seem a bit cleaner overall, > but this will do fine. > Works for me.