From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753625Ab3BUUGt (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:06:49 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171]:57470 "EHLO mail-ob0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751982Ab3BUUGs (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:06:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1361471962-25164-3-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> References: <1361471962-25164-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1361471962-25164-3-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:06:47 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xtensa: Flat DeviceTree copy not future-safe From: Max Filippov To: Vineet Gupta Cc: Andrew Morton , Chris Zankel , Marc Gauthier , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > flat DT copy code calls bootmem allocator with @align = 0. > This is probably OK with legacy allocator which xtensa uses right now, > but this will panic right away with memblock allocator > > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta > Cc: Chris Zankel > Cc: Max Filippov > Cc: Marc Gauthier > Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Max Filippov -- Thanks. -- Max