From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A909C433F5 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 12:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D9F610A0 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 12:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236192AbhIVMtr (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:49:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32834 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236135AbhIVMtm (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:49:42 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C32C061764 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 05:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id 73so9176016qki.4 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 05:48:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BOd6h/Yrxn5Oodi5c84PARcC+Qmls9Bjqxy6D0i0gaE=; b=LC7zuodttu1Ldc3PmL3UjrqEjro5G6YVm2qOGl003DTcVkLTUSdUIWa6OKtoqRkVlf j0ix+QBTVVqcUWeSRjxxdHn0lUBzQDHL1DaxnWnr42cDle3K84/oSTERXmEtLJMtKP6M OoYuft2DDLGK0prGGnNr1uZnivFMmzG7rNuwcy3JHyVbF/z5s66uSVqfTK3KYd0YL13t ZctY/pAkNrCAH7GJIlnrmJ3QmfQUn7nKkErG+aoaOOiFG0aTyO4yca+PjuvvVdUxT8cI 7XUYavZXn3IsH5DtnoN2GGF8iePvcaZ/K8REn7ultKz6EXUTBkxY7ozBVjNoKmoihyBC hEQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BOd6h/Yrxn5Oodi5c84PARcC+Qmls9Bjqxy6D0i0gaE=; b=jInNYeNb9rWIEGm6ARcZ1w8/7qJYKxQ0lM5UPFmQfcPtqiLqUllBW/YLLTKzoJ8dl1 1fhP6NvMjVbFyy1XZUNCEZd+N+nhDO9WEaXvqJbBrf58YkqIzJFA1Tnbj67QkojrNcRL tILdjmxSrcoWcb81VtDjiWJCK3haQt573OUi0YV0qy9y0WkwHBWuyKhT+D1We9rF+pfD CN1ZGxi0gIxFBL8DfrqKZCsO9GQQWTpK1zw1fotHB9NMLCUfmuvGfkEWamI2fOz69Eib USJVyp3wRSmR7gRtlPTvd6u6i1EqIa6o04EfBoIbR0sdN9s629TZrtHE8fG1NBWkuRQq JFxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309k75W7w54quAtbTQwt8QYYkgJi3MGHp2Puhmc15TecW2o6x+E S2Pt8xXxPboQ3uzCF23XeMLANs8C9OYbuYUheTLCdw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOnb/1MbqqxB20FR/qra6sz62kiRapIfLwVRJgk660z7HoheEro+RuNYOomgpi6g87ak9y0dwq/PN9fFl4EzI= X-Received: by 2002:a25:14d6:: with SMTP id 205mr1886426ybu.93.1632314886788; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 05:48:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210816093856.12313-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <86fafc6f-113c-2ea9-579b-ea29343865da@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:47:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH regression fix] gpiolib: acpi: Make set-debounce-timeout failures non fatal To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Hans de Goede , Linus Walleij , Mika Westerberg , Andy Shevchenko , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , ACPI Devel Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:56 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:17 PM Bartosz Golaszewski > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:42 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > > On 9/21/21 8:28 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:39 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > > ... > > > > >> Fixes: 8dcb7a15a585 ("gpiolib: acpi: Take into account debounce settings") > > > >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > > > > > > > Bartosz will pick this up I think, I'm a bit off duty with GPIO right now. > > > > > > Added Bartosz to the To: list, to make sure that he actually > > > sees this. I somehow did not add him in the To/Cc when sending out > > > the patch, sorry about that. > > > > Yep, I only process patches that are directed to me personally (TO or CC). > > Hmm... It's then strange that GPIO lib ACPI is not listed for you in > MAINTAINERS. > Perhaps we need to update MAINTAINERS as well. > With the following line in MAINTAINERS: 7998 F: drivers/gpio/ My name should pop up for all patches aimed at the GPIO subsystem if one uses scripts/get_maintainer.pl. Bart