diff for duplicates of <CAMsRxf+okps60OxQnPkqHck8pWHrkPnT6boo603pC2XEbFYoRQ@mail.gmail.com>
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 14c107b..19765da 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
Same results for me with 3.3.0-rc1 + 5 patches.
-top - 14:42:34 up 8 min, 1 user, load average: 0.70, 0.29, 0.15
-Tasks: 75 total, 2 running, 73 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
-Cpu(s): 32.9%us, 1.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 65.8%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
-Mem: 940232k total, 118520k used, 821712k free, 8080k buffers
-Swap: 524240k total, 0k used, 524240k free, 79432k cached
+top - 14:42:34 up 8 min, ?1 user, ?load average: 0.70, 0.29, 0.15
+Tasks: ?75 total, ? 2 running, ?73 sleeping, ? 0 stopped, ? 0 zombie
+Cpu(s): 32.9%us, ?1.3%sy, ?0.0%ni, 65.8%id, ?0.0%wa, ?0.0%hi, ?0.0%si, ?0.0%st
+Mem: ? ?940232k total, ? 118520k used, ? 821712k free, ? ? 8080k buffers
+Swap: ? 524240k total, ? ? ? ?0k used, ? 524240k free, ? ?79432k cached
- PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
- 3868 eranian 20 0 644 160 128 R 99 0.0 0:53.34 noploop
- 3870 eranian 20 0 2284 1060 804 R 3 0.1 0:00.63 top
- 1 root 20 0 2564 1532 952 S 0 0.2 0:01.26 init
+? PID USER ? ? ?PR ?NI ?VIRT ?RES ?SHR S %CPU %MEM ? ?TIME+ ?COMMAND
+?3868 eranian ? 20 ? 0 ? 644 ?160 ?128 R ? 99 ?0.0 ? 0:53.34 noploop
+?3870 eranian ? 20 ? 0 ?2284 1060 ?804 R ? ?3 ?0.1 ? 0:00.63 top
+? ? 1 root ? ? ?20 ? 0 ?2564 1532 ?952 S ? ?0 ?0.2 ? 0:01.26 init
I am connecting to the board via ssh.
But the results don't look correct to me.
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:24 AM, stephane eranian
>>>
>>> In fact, the problem is visible using top.
>>> I am running a noploop program on CPU0 and nothing else besides top.
->>> The noploop program does: for(;;);. That is 100% user. On a 2-way
+>>> The noploop program ?does: for(;;);. That is 100% user. On a 2-way
>>
>> Sometimes it is not 100% user, for example irq/exception handling...
>>
@@ -44,34 +44,34 @@ On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:24 AM, stephane eranian
>>>
>>> Top with the commit:
>>>
->>> top - 16:19:21 up 5 min, 1 user, load average: 0.23, 0.15, 0.07
->>> Tasks: 70 total, 2 running, 68 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
->>> Cpu(s): 31.1%us, 2.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 66.2%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.7%si, 0.0%st
->>> ^^^^^^^^ That's WRONG
+>>> top - 16:19:21 up 5 min, ?1 user, ?load average: 0.23, 0.15, 0.07
+>>> Tasks: ?70 total, ? 2 running, ?68 sleeping, ? 0 stopped, ? 0 zombie
+>>> Cpu(s): 31.1%us, ?2.0%sy, ?0.0%ni, 66.2%id, ?0.0%wa, ?0.0%hi, ?0.7%si, ?0.0%st
+>>> ? ? ? ? ? ?^^^^^^^^ That's WRONG
>>
>> Did you reproduce the issue each time or just occasionally?
>>
>> Looks no such issue on my board with 3.3-rc1 plus the 5 extra pmu/emu patches.
>>
->> top - 00:59:15 up 7 min, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 0.73, 0.35
->> Tasks: 56 total, 2 running, 54 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
->> Cpu(s): 42.6%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 56.8%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.4%si, 0.0%st
->> Mem: 1013560k total, 50960k used, 962600k free, 6272k buffers
->> Swap: 0k total, 0k used, 0k free, 29036k cached
+>> top - 00:59:15 up 7 min, ?1 user, ?load average: 1.00, 0.73, 0.35
+>> Tasks: ?56 total, ? 2 running, ?54 sleeping, ? 0 stopped, ? 0 zombie
+>> Cpu(s): 42.6%us, ?0.2%sy, ?0.0%ni, 56.8%id, ?0.0%wa, ?0.0%hi, ?0.4%si, ?0.0%st
+>> Mem: ? 1013560k total, ? ?50960k used, ? 962600k free, ? ? 6272k buffers
+>> Swap: ? ? ? ?0k total, ? ? ? ?0k used, ? ? ? ?0k free, ? ?29036k cached
>>
->> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
->> 1355 root 20 0 1460 260 216 R 99 0.0 5:07.38 busy
->> 532 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.23 kworker/1:1
->> 1356 root 20 0 2552 1120 916 R 0 0.1 0:01.93 top
+>> ?PID USER ? ? ?PR ?NI ?VIRT ?RES ?SHR S %CPU %MEM ? ?TIME+ ?COMMAND
+>> ?1355 root ? ? ?20 ? 0 ?1460 ?260 ?216 R ? 99 ?0.0 ? 5:07.38 busy
+>> ?532 root ? ? ?20 ? 0 ? ? 0 ? ?0 ? ?0 S ? ?0 ?0.0 ? 0:00.23 kworker/1:1
+>> ?1356 root ? ? ?20 ? 0 ?2552 1120 ?916 R ? ?0 ?0.1 ? 0:01.93 top
>>
>>>
->>> Mem: 940292k total, 74984k used, 865308k free, 8020k buffers
->>> Swap: 524240k total, 0k used, 524240k free, 37420k cached
+>>> Mem: ? ?940292k total, ? ?74984k used, ? 865308k free, ? ? 8020k buffers
+>>> Swap: ? 524240k total, ? ? ? ?0k used, ? 524240k free, ? ?37420k cached
>>>
->>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
->>> 3770 eranian 20 0 644 160 128 R 99 0.0 0:14.21 noploop
->>> 3771 eranian 20 0 2184 1052 804 R 2 0.1 0:00.32 top
->>> 1 root 20 0 2564 1528 952 S 0 0.2 0:01.26 init
+>>> ?PID USER ? ? ?PR ?NI ?VIRT ?RES ?SHR S %CPU %MEM ? ?TIME+ ?COMMAND
+>>> ?3770 eranian ? 20 ? 0 644 160 128 R ? 99 ?0.0 ? 0:14.21 noploop
+>>> ?3771 eranian ? 20 ? 0 ?2184 1052 ?804 R ? ?2 ?0.1 ? 0:00.32 top
+>>> ? ?1 root ? ? ?20 ? 0 ?2564 1528 ?952 S ? ?0 ?0.2 ? 0:01.26 init
>>>
>>>
>>> I removed that one liner patch from Ming. The one fiddling with the
@@ -80,37 +80,37 @@ On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:24 AM, stephane eranian
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains44xx_data.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains44xx_data.c
>>> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static struct clockdomain emu_sys_44xx_clkdm = {
->>> .prcm_partition = OMAP4430_PRM_PARTITION,
->>> .cm_inst = OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_CM_INST,
->>> .clkdm_offs = OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_CM_EMU_CDOFFS,
->>> - .flags = CLKDM_CAN_HWSUP,
->>> + .flags = CLKDM_CAN_SWSUP,
+>>> ? ? ? ?.prcm_partition ? = OMAP4430_PRM_PARTITION,
+>>> ? ? ? ?.cm_inst ? ? ? ? ?= OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_CM_INST,
+>>> ? ? ? ?.clkdm_offs ? ? ? = OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_CM_EMU_CDOFFS,
+>>> - ? ? ? .flags ? ? ? ? ? ?= CLKDM_CAN_HWSUP,
+>>> + ? ? ? .flags ? ? ? ? ? ?= CLKDM_CAN_SWSUP,
>>
>> The patch should not affect timer tick logic, and what the patch does is
->> just to revert the commit [1] wrt. emu clock domain.
+>> just to revert the commit [1] ?wrt. emu clock domain.
>>
>>>
>>> When I rerun, the test, it now work:
>>>
->>> top - 16:02:51 up 15 min, 1 user, load average: 1.02, 0.46, 0.21
->>> Tasks: 70 total, 2 running, 68 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
->>> Cpu(s): 47.2%us, 1.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 50.8%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 1.0%si, 0.0%st
->>> ^^^^^^^^ close enough (in it stabilize somehow around 49%
+>>> top - 16:02:51 up 15 min, ?1 user, ?load average: 1.02, 0.46, 0.21
+>>> Tasks: ?70 total, ? 2 running, ?68 sleeping, ? 0 stopped, ? 0 zombie
+>>> Cpu(s): 47.2%us, ?1.0%sy, ?0.0%ni, 50.8%id, ?0.0%wa, ?0.0%hi, ?1.0%si, ?0.0%st
+>>> ? ? ? ? ? ^^^^^^^^ close enough (in it stabilize somehow around 49%
>>> which is good)
>>>
->>> Mem: 940292k total, 75288k used, 865004k free, 8004k buffers
->>> Swap: 524240k total, 0k used, 524240k free, 37408k cached
+>>> Mem: ? ?940292k total, ? ?75288k used, ? 865004k free, ? ? 8004k buffers
+>>> Swap: ? 524240k total, ? ? ? ?0k used, ? 524240k free, ? ?37408k cached
>>>
->>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
->>> 3771 eranian 20 0 644 160 128 R 100 0.0 0:34.44 noploop
+>>> ?PID USER ? ? ?PR ?NI ?VIRT ?RES ?SHR S %CPU %MEM ? ?TIME+ ?COMMAND
+>>> ?3771 eranian ? 20 ? 0 644 160 128 R ?100 ?0.0 ? 0:34.44 noploop
>>>
>>> Although the patch fixes PMU interrupts, it breaks the timer tick logic somehow.
>>> The perf problem is related to timer tick.
>>>
>>> I am hoping that the tradeoff is not:
->>> PMU interrupts but broken timer ticks
+>>> ? ? PMU interrupts but broken timer ticks
>>> vs.
->>> No PMU interrupts but working timer ticks
+>>> ? ?No PMU interrupts but working timer ticks
>>
>>
>>
@@ -119,8 +119,4 @@ On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:24 AM, stephane eranian
>>
>> thanks
>> --
->> Ming Lei
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
-the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
-More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
\ No newline at end of file
+>> Ming Lei
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 777f5e1..24b3d5f 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -44,26 +44,16 @@
"ref\0CAMsRxfJq1-tSQH4bv0BeNWXV9aysi9AUvywkh3e9SaamMDfZ0Q\@mail.gmail.com\0"
]
[
- "From\0stephane eranian <eranian\@googlemail.com>\0"
+ "From\0eranian\@googlemail.com (stephane eranian)\0"
]
[
- "Subject\0Re: oprofile and ARM A9 hardware counter\0"
+ "Subject\0oprofile and ARM A9 hardware counter\0"
]
[
"Date\0Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:43:59 +0100\0"
]
[
- "To\0Ming Lei <ming.lei\@canonical.com>\0"
-]
-[
- "Cc\0Will Deacon <will.deacon\@arm.com>",
- " M\303\245ns Rullg\303\245rd <mans\@mansr.com>",
- " Cousson",
- " Benoit <b-cousson\@ti.com>",
- " oprofile-list\@lists.sourceforge.net <oprofile-list\@lists.sourceforge.net>",
- " linux-omap\@vger.kernel.org <linux-omap\@vger.kernel.org>",
- " linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org>",
- " santosh.shilimkar\@ti.com <santosh.shilimkar\@ti.com>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org\0"
]
[
"\0000:1\0"
@@ -75,16 +65,16 @@
"Same results for me with 3.3.0-rc1 + 5 patches.\n",
"\n",
"\n",
- "top - 14:42:34 up 8 min, \302\2401 user, \302\240load average: 0.70, 0.29, 0.15\n",
- "Tasks: \302\24075 total, \302\240 2 running, \302\24073 sleeping, \302\240 0 stopped, \302\240 0 zombie\n",
- "Cpu(s): 32.9%us, \302\2401.3%sy, \302\2400.0%ni, 65.8%id, \302\2400.0%wa, \302\2400.0%hi, \302\2400.0%si, \302\2400.0%st\n",
- "Mem: \302\240 \302\240940232k total, \302\240 118520k used, \302\240 821712k free, \302\240 \302\240 8080k buffers\n",
- "Swap: \302\240 524240k total, \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\2400k used, \302\240 524240k free, \302\240 \302\24079432k cached\n",
+ "top - 14:42:34 up 8 min, ?1 user, ?load average: 0.70, 0.29, 0.15\n",
+ "Tasks: ?75 total, ? 2 running, ?73 sleeping, ? 0 stopped, ? 0 zombie\n",
+ "Cpu(s): 32.9%us, ?1.3%sy, ?0.0%ni, 65.8%id, ?0.0%wa, ?0.0%hi, ?0.0%si, ?0.0%st\n",
+ "Mem: ? ?940232k total, ? 118520k used, ? 821712k free, ? ? 8080k buffers\n",
+ "Swap: ? 524240k total, ? ? ? ?0k used, ? 524240k free, ? ?79432k cached\n",
"\n",
- "\302\240 PID USER \302\240 \302\240 \302\240PR \302\240NI \302\240VIRT \302\240RES \302\240SHR S %CPU %MEM \302\240 \302\240TIME+ \302\240COMMAND\n",
- "\302\2403868 eranian \302\240 20 \302\240 0 \302\240 644 \302\240160 \302\240128 R \302\240 99 \302\2400.0 \302\240 0:53.34 noploop\n",
- "\302\2403870 eranian \302\240 20 \302\240 0 \302\2402284 1060 \302\240804 R \302\240 \302\2403 \302\2400.1 \302\240 0:00.63 top\n",
- "\302\240 \302\240 1 root \302\240 \302\240 \302\24020 \302\240 0 \302\2402564 1532 \302\240952 S \302\240 \302\2400 \302\2400.2 \302\240 0:01.26 init\n",
+ "? PID USER ? ? ?PR ?NI ?VIRT ?RES ?SHR S %CPU %MEM ? ?TIME+ ?COMMAND\n",
+ "?3868 eranian ? 20 ? 0 ? 644 ?160 ?128 R ? 99 ?0.0 ? 0:53.34 noploop\n",
+ "?3870 eranian ? 20 ? 0 ?2284 1060 ?804 R ? ?3 ?0.1 ? 0:00.63 top\n",
+ "? ? 1 root ? ? ?20 ? 0 ?2564 1532 ?952 S ? ?0 ?0.2 ? 0:01.26 init\n",
"\n",
"I am connecting to the board via ssh.\n",
"But the results don't look correct to me.\n",
@@ -110,7 +100,7 @@
">>>\n",
">>> In fact, the problem is visible using top.\n",
">>> I am running a noploop program on CPU0 and nothing else besides top.\n",
- ">>> The noploop program \302\240does: for(;;);. That is 100% user. On a 2-way\n",
+ ">>> The noploop program ?does: for(;;);. That is 100% user. On a 2-way\n",
">>\n",
">> Sometimes it is not 100% user, for example irq/exception handling...\n",
">>\n",
@@ -118,34 +108,34 @@
">>>\n",
">>> Top with the commit:\n",
">>>\n",
- ">>> top - 16:19:21 up 5 min, \302\2401 user, \302\240load average: 0.23, 0.15, 0.07\n",
- ">>> Tasks: \302\24070 total, \302\240 2 running, \302\24068 sleeping, \302\240 0 stopped, \302\240 0 zombie\n",
- ">>> Cpu(s): 31.1%us, \302\2402.0%sy, \302\2400.0%ni, 66.2%id, \302\2400.0%wa, \302\2400.0%hi, \302\2400.7%si, \302\2400.0%st\n",
- ">>> \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240^^^^^^^^ That's WRONG\n",
+ ">>> top - 16:19:21 up 5 min, ?1 user, ?load average: 0.23, 0.15, 0.07\n",
+ ">>> Tasks: ?70 total, ? 2 running, ?68 sleeping, ? 0 stopped, ? 0 zombie\n",
+ ">>> Cpu(s): 31.1%us, ?2.0%sy, ?0.0%ni, 66.2%id, ?0.0%wa, ?0.0%hi, ?0.7%si, ?0.0%st\n",
+ ">>> ? ? ? ? ? ?^^^^^^^^ That's WRONG\n",
">>\n",
">> Did you reproduce the issue each time or just occasionally?\n",
">>\n",
">> Looks no such issue on my board with 3.3-rc1 plus the 5 extra pmu/emu patches.\n",
">>\n",
- ">> top - 00:59:15 up 7 min, \302\2401 user, \302\240load average: 1.00, 0.73, 0.35\n",
- ">> Tasks: \302\24056 total, \302\240 2 running, \302\24054 sleeping, \302\240 0 stopped, \302\240 0 zombie\n",
- ">> Cpu(s): 42.6%us, \302\2400.2%sy, \302\2400.0%ni, 56.8%id, \302\2400.0%wa, \302\2400.0%hi, \302\2400.4%si, \302\2400.0%st\n",
- ">> Mem: \302\240 1013560k total, \302\240 \302\24050960k used, \302\240 962600k free, \302\240 \302\240 6272k buffers\n",
- ">> Swap: \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\2400k total, \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\2400k used, \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\2400k free, \302\240 \302\24029036k cached\n",
+ ">> top - 00:59:15 up 7 min, ?1 user, ?load average: 1.00, 0.73, 0.35\n",
+ ">> Tasks: ?56 total, ? 2 running, ?54 sleeping, ? 0 stopped, ? 0 zombie\n",
+ ">> Cpu(s): 42.6%us, ?0.2%sy, ?0.0%ni, 56.8%id, ?0.0%wa, ?0.0%hi, ?0.4%si, ?0.0%st\n",
+ ">> Mem: ? 1013560k total, ? ?50960k used, ? 962600k free, ? ? 6272k buffers\n",
+ ">> Swap: ? ? ? ?0k total, ? ? ? ?0k used, ? ? ? ?0k free, ? ?29036k cached\n",
">>\n",
- ">> \302\240PID USER \302\240 \302\240 \302\240PR \302\240NI \302\240VIRT \302\240RES \302\240SHR S %CPU %MEM \302\240 \302\240TIME+ \302\240COMMAND\n",
- ">> \302\2401355 root \302\240 \302\240 \302\24020 \302\240 0 \302\2401460 \302\240260 \302\240216 R \302\240 99 \302\2400.0 \302\240 5:07.38 busy\n",
- ">> \302\240532 root \302\240 \302\240 \302\24020 \302\240 0 \302\240 \302\240 0 \302\240 \302\2400 \302\240 \302\2400 S \302\240 \302\2400 \302\2400.0 \302\240 0:00.23 kworker/1:1\n",
- ">> \302\2401356 root \302\240 \302\240 \302\24020 \302\240 0 \302\2402552 1120 \302\240916 R \302\240 \302\2400 \302\2400.1 \302\240 0:01.93 top\n",
+ ">> ?PID USER ? ? ?PR ?NI ?VIRT ?RES ?SHR S %CPU %MEM ? ?TIME+ ?COMMAND\n",
+ ">> ?1355 root ? ? ?20 ? 0 ?1460 ?260 ?216 R ? 99 ?0.0 ? 5:07.38 busy\n",
+ ">> ?532 root ? ? ?20 ? 0 ? ? 0 ? ?0 ? ?0 S ? ?0 ?0.0 ? 0:00.23 kworker/1:1\n",
+ ">> ?1356 root ? ? ?20 ? 0 ?2552 1120 ?916 R ? ?0 ?0.1 ? 0:01.93 top\n",
">>\n",
">>>\n",
- ">>> Mem: \302\240 \302\240940292k total, \302\240 \302\24074984k used, \302\240 865308k free, \302\240 \302\240 8020k buffers\n",
- ">>> Swap: \302\240 524240k total, \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\2400k used, \302\240 524240k free, \302\240 \302\24037420k cached\n",
+ ">>> Mem: ? ?940292k total, ? ?74984k used, ? 865308k free, ? ? 8020k buffers\n",
+ ">>> Swap: ? 524240k total, ? ? ? ?0k used, ? 524240k free, ? ?37420k cached\n",
">>>\n",
- ">>> \302\240PID USER \302\240 \302\240 \302\240PR \302\240NI \302\240VIRT \302\240RES \302\240SHR S %CPU %MEM \302\240 \302\240TIME+ \302\240COMMAND\n",
- ">>> \302\2403770 eranian \302\240 20 \302\240 0 644 160 128 R \302\240 99 \302\2400.0 \302\240 0:14.21 noploop\n",
- ">>> \302\2403771 eranian \302\240 20 \302\240 0 \302\2402184 1052 \302\240804 R \302\240 \302\2402 \302\2400.1 \302\240 0:00.32 top\n",
- ">>> \302\240 \302\2401 root \302\240 \302\240 \302\24020 \302\240 0 \302\2402564 1528 \302\240952 S \302\240 \302\2400 \302\2400.2 \302\240 0:01.26 init\n",
+ ">>> ?PID USER ? ? ?PR ?NI ?VIRT ?RES ?SHR S %CPU %MEM ? ?TIME+ ?COMMAND\n",
+ ">>> ?3770 eranian ? 20 ? 0 644 160 128 R ? 99 ?0.0 ? 0:14.21 noploop\n",
+ ">>> ?3771 eranian ? 20 ? 0 ?2184 1052 ?804 R ? ?2 ?0.1 ? 0:00.32 top\n",
+ ">>> ? ?1 root ? ? ?20 ? 0 ?2564 1528 ?952 S ? ?0 ?0.2 ? 0:01.26 init\n",
">>>\n",
">>>\n",
">>> I removed that one liner patch from Ming. The one fiddling with the\n",
@@ -154,37 +144,37 @@
">>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains44xx_data.c\n",
">>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains44xx_data.c\n",
">>> \@\@ -390,7 +390,7 \@\@ static struct clockdomain emu_sys_44xx_clkdm = {\n",
- ">>> \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240.prcm_partition \302\240 = OMAP4430_PRM_PARTITION,\n",
- ">>> \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240.cm_inst \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240= OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_CM_INST,\n",
- ">>> \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240.clkdm_offs \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 = OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_CM_EMU_CDOFFS,\n",
- ">>> - \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 .flags \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240= CLKDM_CAN_HWSUP,\n",
- ">>> + \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 .flags \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240= CLKDM_CAN_SWSUP,\n",
+ ">>> ? ? ? ?.prcm_partition ? = OMAP4430_PRM_PARTITION,\n",
+ ">>> ? ? ? ?.cm_inst ? ? ? ? ?= OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_CM_INST,\n",
+ ">>> ? ? ? ?.clkdm_offs ? ? ? = OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_CM_EMU_CDOFFS,\n",
+ ">>> - ? ? ? .flags ? ? ? ? ? ?= CLKDM_CAN_HWSUP,\n",
+ ">>> + ? ? ? .flags ? ? ? ? ? ?= CLKDM_CAN_SWSUP,\n",
">>\n",
">> The patch should not affect timer tick logic, and what the patch does is\n",
- ">> just to revert the commit [1] \302\240wrt. emu clock domain.\n",
+ ">> just to revert the commit [1] ?wrt. emu clock domain.\n",
">>\n",
">>>\n",
">>> When I rerun, the test, it now work:\n",
">>>\n",
- ">>> top - 16:02:51 up 15 min, \302\2401 user, \302\240load average: 1.02, 0.46, 0.21\n",
- ">>> Tasks: \302\24070 total, \302\240 2 running, \302\24068 sleeping, \302\240 0 stopped, \302\240 0 zombie\n",
- ">>> Cpu(s): 47.2%us, \302\2401.0%sy, \302\2400.0%ni, 50.8%id, \302\2400.0%wa, \302\2400.0%hi, \302\2401.0%si, \302\2400.0%st\n",
- ">>> \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 ^^^^^^^^ close enough (in it stabilize somehow around 49%\n",
+ ">>> top - 16:02:51 up 15 min, ?1 user, ?load average: 1.02, 0.46, 0.21\n",
+ ">>> Tasks: ?70 total, ? 2 running, ?68 sleeping, ? 0 stopped, ? 0 zombie\n",
+ ">>> Cpu(s): 47.2%us, ?1.0%sy, ?0.0%ni, 50.8%id, ?0.0%wa, ?0.0%hi, ?1.0%si, ?0.0%st\n",
+ ">>> ? ? ? ? ? ^^^^^^^^ close enough (in it stabilize somehow around 49%\n",
">>> which is good)\n",
">>>\n",
- ">>> Mem: \302\240 \302\240940292k total, \302\240 \302\24075288k used, \302\240 865004k free, \302\240 \302\240 8004k buffers\n",
- ">>> Swap: \302\240 524240k total, \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\2400k used, \302\240 524240k free, \302\240 \302\24037408k cached\n",
+ ">>> Mem: ? ?940292k total, ? ?75288k used, ? 865004k free, ? ? 8004k buffers\n",
+ ">>> Swap: ? 524240k total, ? ? ? ?0k used, ? 524240k free, ? ?37408k cached\n",
">>>\n",
- ">>> \302\240PID USER \302\240 \302\240 \302\240PR \302\240NI \302\240VIRT \302\240RES \302\240SHR S %CPU %MEM \302\240 \302\240TIME+ \302\240COMMAND\n",
- ">>> \302\2403771 eranian \302\240 20 \302\240 0 644 160 128 R \302\240100 \302\2400.0 \302\240 0:34.44 noploop\n",
+ ">>> ?PID USER ? ? ?PR ?NI ?VIRT ?RES ?SHR S %CPU %MEM ? ?TIME+ ?COMMAND\n",
+ ">>> ?3771 eranian ? 20 ? 0 644 160 128 R ?100 ?0.0 ? 0:34.44 noploop\n",
">>>\n",
">>> Although the patch fixes PMU interrupts, it breaks the timer tick logic somehow.\n",
">>> The perf problem is related to timer tick.\n",
">>>\n",
">>> I am hoping that the tradeoff is not:\n",
- ">>> \302\240 \302\240 PMU interrupts but broken timer ticks\n",
+ ">>> ? ? PMU interrupts but broken timer ticks\n",
">>> vs.\n",
- ">>> \302\240 \302\240No PMU interrupts but working timer ticks\n",
+ ">>> ? ?No PMU interrupts but working timer ticks\n",
">>\n",
">>\n",
">>\n",
@@ -193,11 +183,7 @@
">>\n",
">> thanks\n",
">> --\n",
- ">> Ming Lei\n",
- "--\n",
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-omap\" in\n",
- "the body of a message to majordomo\@vger.kernel.org\n",
- "More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html"
+ ">> Ming Lei"
]
-7418e20242c695607b92eb9c022583e5abb29829b0cbb0d76179cd716589aee5
+23a5be120ab3496a0898fa6e6394318bb5360a4edc736396b56da8081e811073
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.