From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:39:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/2] regulator: da9210: Add optional interrupt support Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1424175072-14643-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1424175072-14643-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20150217140110.GV9110@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> <20150219103346.GE3198@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20150219103346.GE3198-bheZrs9scGb3/WHNxyQH9YN0K6Il/+VY@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mark Brown Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Support Opensource , Liam Girdwood , Steve Twiss , Linux-sh list , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" Hi Mark, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 03:18:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:11:12PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> >> - Does there exist any regulator notifier event that corresponds to >> >> DA9210_E_VMAX? > >> > What does that mean, I might be able to tell you? I guess it might be >> > an over voltage event... > >> Possibly. There's no regulator notifier event for that yet, though. >> Shall I add one? > > I'm wondering if it may be better to change the first notification to > just a general "out of regulation" one, though the consequences of over > voltage are usually different to under voltage if that is what's going > on here. > >> Anyway, let's wait for confirmation from Dialog... > > I guess - is there really no indication in the datasheet? -ENOENT (I hope that's actually -EPROBE_DEFER, as I applied for datasheet access last week ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752899AbbBSKj2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:39:28 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]:53155 "EHLO mail-ob0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752340AbbBSKj0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:39:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150219103346.GE3198@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> References: <1424175072-14643-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1424175072-14643-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20150217140110.GV9110@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> <20150219103346.GE3198@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:39:25 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CjuV3SY7mwllb6M5ENtKJZTsBRM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/2] regulator: da9210: Add optional interrupt support From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Mark Brown Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Support Opensource , Liam Girdwood , Steve Twiss , Linux-sh list , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 03:18:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:11:12PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> >> - Does there exist any regulator notifier event that corresponds to >> >> DA9210_E_VMAX? > >> > What does that mean, I might be able to tell you? I guess it might be >> > an over voltage event... > >> Possibly. There's no regulator notifier event for that yet, though. >> Shall I add one? > > I'm wondering if it may be better to change the first notification to > just a general "out of regulation" one, though the consequences of over > voltage are usually different to under voltage if that is what's going > on here. > >> Anyway, let's wait for confirmation from Dialog... > > I guess - is there really no indication in the datasheet? -ENOENT (I hope that's actually -EPROBE_DEFER, as I applied for datasheet access last week ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/2] regulator: da9210: Add optional interrupt support Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:39:25 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1424175072-14643-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1424175072-14643-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20150217140110.GV9110@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> <20150219103346.GE3198@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150219103346.GE3198-bheZrs9scGb3/WHNxyQH9YN0K6Il/+VY@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Support Opensource , Liam Girdwood , Steve Twiss , Linux-sh list , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 03:18:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:11:12PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> >> - Does there exist any regulator notifier event that corresponds to >> >> DA9210_E_VMAX? > >> > What does that mean, I might be able to tell you? I guess it might be >> > an over voltage event... > >> Possibly. There's no regulator notifier event for that yet, though. >> Shall I add one? > > I'm wondering if it may be better to change the first notification to > just a general "out of regulation" one, though the consequences of over > voltage are usually different to under voltage if that is what's going > on here. > >> Anyway, let's wait for confirmation from Dialog... > > I guess - is there really no indication in the datasheet? -ENOENT (I hope that's actually -EPROBE_DEFER, as I applied for datasheet access last week ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html