From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51491585-16fb-93b1-bb1a-09e89683f2f0@cogentembedded.com> <1ef39615-fc82-dc2a-05eb-7b1aed7afa98@cogentembedded.com> In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:10:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77970: add thermal support Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Simon Horman , Rob Herring , Linux-Renesas , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Magnus Damm , Mark Rutland List-ID: Hi Sergei, On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:04 PM Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 10/08/2018 07:40 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>>> Describe THS/CIVM in the R8A77970 device trees. > >>>> Based on the original (and large) patches by Vladimir Barinov. > >>>> + 0 0xe6190100 0 0x38>; > >>> > >>> What about the CIVM status register? DT describes hardware, not driver > >>> limitations. > >> > >> I wasn't sure whether to put it into a separate "reg" tuple (which would confuse > >> the driver) or not. After looking into the manual again, I'm going to extend the > >> 2nd "reg" tuple... > > > > The CIVM Status Register indicates the chip internal voltage. > > As such it's not a per-channel property, and IMHO doesn't belong in the second > > tuple > > I was looking a the block diagrams (both in the chapters 10A and 10B) and I got a totally different impression... I stand corrected. So extending the second reg block is fine. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds