From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932691Ab3GPOat (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:30:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:54445 "EHLO mail-pd0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754700Ab3GPOas (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:30:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130715204135.GH15531@xanatos> References: <20130715155202.GC29526@xanatos> <20130715174659.GC15531@xanatos> <20130715180403.GD15531@xanatos> <20130715184642.GE15531@xanatos> <20130715195316.GF15531@xanatos> <20130715204135.GH15531@xanatos> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:30:45 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Qra_UBtQyaMs297FXBZ5ltULqHE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Sarah Sharp Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Guenter Roeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Steven Rostedt , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , stable , Darren Hart Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote: > I should not have to ask for professional behavior on the mailing lists. > Professional behavior should be the default. So, what does "professional" mean? A professional is paid for his work, an amateur isn't. But this doesn't say anything about code quality, maintainer responsiveness, etc. Does it imply behavior that (hopefully) keeps getting you paid? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds