From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755089AbaFYHxx (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 03:53:53 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54]:44251 "EHLO mail-la0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752483AbaFYHxp (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 03:53:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <53A91449.6010701@roeck-us.net> References: <1402677499-28289-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <1403584501.4587.153.camel@pasglop> <53A90718.4050401@roeck-us.net> <1403588053.4587.160.camel@pasglop> <53A91449.6010701@roeck-us.net> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:53:43 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IBfA3YDkiuLS-MGafVZnxQvMk2s Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix build warning From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Vincent Guittot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Sigh. Much easier to break something than to fix it. That would mean to get > approval > from at least three maintainers, and all that to get rid of a warning. I > don't > really have time for that. Let's just forget about it and live with the > warning. So you send it to akpm. Or perhaps even trivial. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CE251A0012 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:53:50 +1000 (EST) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ty20so454998lab.39 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:53:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <53A91449.6010701@roeck-us.net> References: <1402677499-28289-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <1403584501.4587.153.camel@pasglop> <53A90718.4050401@roeck-us.net> <1403588053.4587.160.camel@pasglop> <53A91449.6010701@roeck-us.net> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:53:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix build warning From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Guenter Roeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Vincent Guittot , Paul Mackerras , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Sigh. Much easier to break something than to fix it. That would mean to get > approval > from at least three maintainers, and all that to get rid of a warning. I > don't > really have time for that. Let's just forget about it and live with the > warning. So you send it to akpm. Or perhaps even trivial. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds