From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:11 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/29] y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit architectures Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: y2038 Mailman List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-Arch , Matt Turner , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Michal Simek , Paul Burton , Helge Deller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Rich Felker , "David S. Miller" On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:25 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This adds 21 new system calls on each ABI that has 32-bit time_t > today. All of these have the exact same semantics as their existing > counterparts, and the new ones all have macro names that end in 'time64' > for clarification. > > This gets us to the point of being able to safely use a C library > that has 64-bit time_t in user space. There are still a couple of > loose ends to tie up in various areas of the code, but this is the > big one, and should be entirely uncontroversial at this point. > > In particular, there are four system calls (getitimer, setitimer, > waitid, and getrusage) that don't have a 64-bit counterpart yet, > but these can all be safely implemented in the C library by wrapping > around the existing system calls because the 32-bit time_t they > pass only counts elapsed time, not time since the epoch. They > will be dealt with later. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 20 +++++++++ For m68k: Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FA7C282DB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBD520989 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730010AbfAUI4a (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:56:30 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-f66.google.com ([209.85.217.66]:37589 "EHLO mail-vs1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729971AbfAUI40 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:56:26 -0500 Received: by mail-vs1-f66.google.com with SMTP id n13so12183765vsk.4; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:56:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gZ5xKfwCuPvjsbs8ypviK2wVON115JbrXd6QLz3o9YM=; b=bHADKebxrqlhIG5XMxev/TeKvRHwYPxkUnLwFwnvUCi/5vHpmRA63HSlijAEcbAxvc NMngcDHCI1ROYq98D8pE/SJBcFeSaytXK212uzydt7PN3WPWtHACtTz5UcFPNTiCBY2k Dee+Xgwe/Xt4yhjiBttzSLjHem8ZB6zDmvkX5zfEnNMaFhYSxWBbDiwlFU8eyez5VccI kM7SH9oZWvvF+avF6RQ/Zt0VHy7Hns8qSRl7woVXnAzfUIVMXTm8bqx6/vdkKCo2THsL YDq1XtzmWmG7QLD5iCWT9vvJQjC5Uu9hTgDqDFsBy1nsaH2xcQGCyN6qeyqs9GPdozA8 h74w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeODy/Zyn10VHLunphFNiXdTmE4OBhNYsXwZj0LujD7kPSb3BhJ 8tkLSjd2nX0KJ5xKLZPFuhAkcJLaK0n4POVaujM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6oQTjQTvMkhu0RSRQU3eG9DnGNZiAO15hurqtwS01M6srTDPs1MhTBku760Abay4RjwT0+IVQlARbp3cdEMM8= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c202:: with SMTP id i2mr11527790vsj.11.1548060984197; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:56:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:56:11 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/29] y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit architectures To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: y2038 Mailman List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-Arch , Matt Turner , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Michal Simek , Paul Burton , Helge Deller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Rich Felker , "David S. Miller" , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Max Filippov , Andrew Morton , Deepa Dinamani , "Eric W. Biederman" , Firoz Khan , alpha , Linux ARM , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , linux-m68k , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Parisc List , linuxppc-dev , linux-s390 , Linux-sh list , sparclinux , netdev , Linux FS Devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:25 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This adds 21 new system calls on each ABI that has 32-bit time_t > today. All of these have the exact same semantics as their existing > counterparts, and the new ones all have macro names that end in 'time64' > for clarification. > > This gets us to the point of being able to safely use a C library > that has 64-bit time_t in user space. There are still a couple of > loose ends to tie up in various areas of the code, but this is the > big one, and should be entirely uncontroversial at this point. > > In particular, there are four system calls (getitimer, setitimer, > waitid, and getrusage) that don't have a 64-bit counterpart yet, > but these can all be safely implemented in the C library by wrapping > around the existing system calls because the 32-bit time_t they > pass only counts elapsed time, not time since the epoch. They > will be dealt with later. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 20 +++++++++ For m68k: Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/29] y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit architectures Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:56:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: y2038 Mailman List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-Arch , Matt Turner , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Michal Simek , Paul Burton , Helge Deller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Rich Felker , "David S. Miller" List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:25 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This adds 21 new system calls on each ABI that has 32-bit time_t > today. All of these have the exact same semantics as their existing > counterparts, and the new ones all have macro names that end in 'time64' > for clarification. > > This gets us to the point of being able to safely use a C library > that has 64-bit time_t in user space. There are still a couple of > loose ends to tie up in various areas of the code, but this is the > big one, and should be entirely uncontroversial at this point. > > In particular, there are four system calls (getitimer, setitimer, > waitid, and getrusage) that don't have a 64-bit counterpart yet, > but these can all be safely implemented in the C library by wrapping > around the existing system calls because the 32-bit time_t they > pass only counts elapsed time, not time since the epoch. They > will be dealt with later. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 20 +++++++++ For m68k: Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B8CC282DB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C7B2085A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:07:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 06C7B2085A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43jm011lS9zDqJV for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 20:07:13 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=209.85.217.65; helo=mail-vs1-f65.google.com; envelope-from=geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Received: from mail-vs1-f65.google.com (mail-vs1-f65.google.com [209.85.217.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43jllb0Vm1zDqFY for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:56:26 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-vs1-f65.google.com with SMTP id e7so12171979vsc.2 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:56:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gZ5xKfwCuPvjsbs8ypviK2wVON115JbrXd6QLz3o9YM=; b=p7DST2AwkVpd4dZlh5g0hOEdM0YtLu31GkCuU7nYybNuRG6ye+ra3K0KbDUsf1GTmF 2sSEagL384mKEYNk0u1kevhy/chWMiJSKl6lM3ht+1MaGus7XXNAyKNgJjF86Gj85LZT upvDVSS7KWLru7OQdCcUUOked+7oh3TYQdMRmm9Ebw096FqixXu+GrZXWP8/N5BHslv0 tyr/D3W8XXJX24HgGYgu7xAUtgHIH8ibURqmwlVPlQNQLIT1C7CG7KXnbkVGfOQTOmrB vbUTmpTgzlbHA8Tp+rd18kzzCmg/6jktXid2TDs6O4aI93ntSojhGmc7a/185EJsiEaB abAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeYSskQB8pouKAtHlCwGOAI3f8Xf1nyt+AHOUmToC59Lk3CQlMJ 1phg5CODP3g87yZokoi/b/Mz89IZ0ZUpxDB2q7k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6oQTjQTvMkhu0RSRQU3eG9DnGNZiAO15hurqtwS01M6srTDPs1MhTBku760Abay4RjwT0+IVQlARbp3cdEMM8= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c202:: with SMTP id i2mr11527790vsj.11.1548060984197; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:56:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:56:11 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/29] y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit architectures To: Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , netdev , Deepa Dinamani , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux , Linux-Arch , linux-s390 , y2038 Mailman List , Helge Deller , the arch/x86 maintainers , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , Firoz Khan , Catalin Marinas , Matt Turner , Fenghua Yu , Will Deacon , Linux FS Devel , linux-m68k , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM , Michal Simek , Tony Luck , Parisc List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Burton , "Eric W. Biederman" , alpha , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:25 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This adds 21 new system calls on each ABI that has 32-bit time_t > today. All of these have the exact same semantics as their existing > counterparts, and the new ones all have macro names that end in 'time64' > for clarification. > > This gets us to the point of being able to safely use a C library > that has 64-bit time_t in user space. There are still a couple of > loose ends to tie up in various areas of the code, but this is the > big one, and should be entirely uncontroversial at this point. > > In particular, there are four system calls (getitimer, setitimer, > waitid, and getrusage) that don't have a 64-bit counterpart yet, > but these can all be safely implemented in the C library by wrapping > around the existing system calls because the 32-bit time_t they > pass only counts elapsed time, not time since the epoch. They > will be dealt with later. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 20 +++++++++ For m68k: Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB2CC282F6 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E45B2085A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="iDhxWFdb" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5E45B2085A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=4dRIVeQYKuwj/cKK1HVnfkyir5GIuZdR9ONatHOoIdg=; b=iDhxWFdb/D/WZY /TSkS1LoZc5PzqS9el+PHi4srm6+uAL7hMJXgFGH3EqTNXRDGD9YeKBeChU7f13ESwVghHg6ZWqil y/aj8y59aQs3428MGzUR366SfMB16+A/B+G4NR6EGaPAsXfDaw1M0qfnKh5gpnqMSG4BHply3+JAn qG2Wz4ZuR3F52HsB53ZNMUlNhBiqx987KKJ8R/TeOGO5P7D0aXfIIW6bF0QJnjMoaKVd7hAlageDd +G2xztACYK6SkBwldLtuo20ja91lJ9vsGNRImln3ghcsop7CYvZOmnYC27WM2gthBS/zjgYgjQ/cJ Z83wYfe7YIzwTdoMDvzA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1glVY8-0001f0-Qi; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:07:20 +0000 Received: from mail-vs1-f67.google.com ([209.85.217.67]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1glVNZ-0004fL-Ez for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:44 +0000 Received: by mail-vs1-f67.google.com with SMTP id b74so12132782vsd.9 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:56:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gZ5xKfwCuPvjsbs8ypviK2wVON115JbrXd6QLz3o9YM=; b=GHMSaEptipv5bHU+Wkbc3GWpjhNUMmQqsRz+xiCJZbSVpW/r/nbwYxL7yBKra5aOrq H04hZ7pX+fMpbYAfgpI0XA0eludVy58qREgYBRbM4hst6B+Bd5S9njgNPyI8JH/TQs7E 2vIMkP1Lh+HLkKrpwcX4AoS3IP29muSDmUezPT0L9pJzgFtTm3o/f+AQ3sh27cMBY7Op /AOe1cRBfqyJYRJ89BSWH/Qn/1ZJ98wi98xH0I81ALGEA/5jjXK7FjmA0qPRIoXTcruz kvSuBveWgFMUSgszPAlkVLw49GnJ3PaizORsHKBBGxWz/K7y8BSZNzfXm2VNiBxHlT73 h5ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUuke6J8u2HKmjHNqFwMlruzoHjEBk7RI36Mwopb13m3LT25QlXSzG 9gY/madNYS81VhcwVYahkftucSlAzi7TRevLars= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6oQTjQTvMkhu0RSRQU3eG9DnGNZiAO15hurqtwS01M6srTDPs1MhTBku760Abay4RjwT0+IVQlARbp3cdEMM8= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c202:: with SMTP id i2mr11527790vsj.11.1548060984197; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:56:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:56:11 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/29] y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit architectures To: Arnd Bergmann X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190121_005626_091600_7E6B8789 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , netdev , Deepa Dinamani , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux , Linux-Arch , linux-s390 , y2038 Mailman List , Michael Ellerman , Helge Deller , the arch/x86 maintainers , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , Firoz Khan , Catalin Marinas , Matt Turner , Fenghua Yu , Will Deacon , Linux FS Devel , linux-m68k , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM , Michal Simek , Tony Luck , Parisc List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Burton , "Eric W. Biederman" , alpha , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:25 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This adds 21 new system calls on each ABI that has 32-bit time_t > today. All of these have the exact same semantics as their existing > counterparts, and the new ones all have macro names that end in 'time64' > for clarification. > > This gets us to the point of being able to safely use a C library > that has 64-bit time_t in user space. There are still a couple of > loose ends to tie up in various areas of the code, but this is the > big one, and should be entirely uncontroversial at this point. > > In particular, there are four system calls (getitimer, setitimer, > waitid, and getrusage) that don't have a 64-bit counterpart yet, > but these can all be safely implemented in the C library by wrapping > around the existing system calls because the 32-bit time_t they > pass only counts elapsed time, not time since the epoch. They > will be dealt with later. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 20 +++++++++ For m68k: Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel