From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-vk1-f169.google.com (mail-vk1-f169.google.com [209.85.221.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463BB2FA1 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id k128so6908123vke.9 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:13:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j9Ic9W7mtZncUBVTMeBKySExuiDJv16P2Skp68R804c=; b=mIhUc2XP/eyzhkXprfTQIYvNM3DjNEvARsbAWtWnUEB/SjzQmc+gH28SHwMm3azjLV FeJ2OoG1K3z/c/fpZQqx9fXHQIuC0yQtocXZk0TjSEu/x9SmdeknPC4ZqZeq+SXwveIn qXEB5AklJuDHQfXnB8ZSOvfdTinYtt34S83sKYVR4qp7SAtlkNBbotgzxMO/PPjOCtwq RFG30cTbCzC7fce8bytcFOII9DdGOkOx+q0rlmLl4K3XmDdV69ELXAi1UNhT571Ey/GZ IPkZID2sCLuZmKfJ8EaZsN+MFiLQJdSdZHgbLDGFHms7hFActITCxLmq0rrp5ngZ195k qV1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IZDC62NwpPkSWFWDGN/nuB1vc1TpNwqiIRVKQyL35z1aYrqzF YpblSLba8S9HpEZcccCWQxb5r2hh7LXETIQHpo3CG5fgXKQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJxFXiTUuyYH18h9vN/BedJUG+JIStKFxMdq78Ka5NymKgWTpoHwuwmIqJhnAf1/K9nTA5CycJt0x+seoFbtM= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:5682:: with SMTP id k124mr2087150vkb.2.1619162034343; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:13:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210422124023.GD4572@sirena.org.uk> <20210422132339.GF4572@sirena.org.uk> <20210422111939.0c555039@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:13:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Rethinking the acceptance policy for "trivial" patches To: Greg KH Cc: Steven Rostedt , Mark Brown , Mike Rapoport , Leon Romanovsky , James Bottomley , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Greg, On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 8:17 AM Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:19:39AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:23:39 +0100 > > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > For me the most annoying is to get several patches from the middle of a > > > > series. IMHO, sending at least cover letter to everyone is the bare minimum > > > > so that people at least can take a look at high level details and request a > > > > repost. > > > > > > Yes, the cover letter should always go to everyone. > > > > And that's still the one thing that quilt send-mail does not support :-p > > 'git format-patch --cover-letter' also does not seem to support this, so > what tool does? You can (manually) add "Cc: name
" lines to the individual files created by "git format-patch", which will be used by "git send-email". I guess this can also be done to the mbox saved by "quilt mail --mbox"? Alternatively, if you have format.thread in your git config, the saved files will already have their final Message-IDs, so you can add to all individual patches a lore link pointing to the cover letter. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds