From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:31:13 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state, with new maintainers Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20160108043907.GA7005@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160108043959.GA7856@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160111175307.GC6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160113014046.GA22101@verge.net.au> <20160115005229.GB238@brightrain.aerifal.cx> In-Reply-To: <20160115005229.GB238@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Rich Felker , Yoshinori Sato Cc: Linux-sh list , Simon Horman , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , "D. Jeff Dionne" , Rob Landley Hi Rich, Sato-san, On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:40:46AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:53:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote: >> > > From: Rich Felker >> > > >> > > Add Yoshinori Sato and Rich Felker as maintainers for arch/sh >> > > (SUPERH). >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Rich Felker >> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato >> > > Acked-by: D. Jeff Dionne >> > > Acked-by: Rob Landley >> > >> > A much appreciated move, >> > >> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) >> >> Likewise, >> >> Acked-by: Simon Horman Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > While patch 2/2 still seems to need discussion and resolution, I don't > think this part (1/2, adding us as maintainers) is controversial. Can > it be committed now? Geert? Andrew? I think it should go in either through Andrew, or through yourself, depending on whether you already have other stuff ready for this merge window, and have a git repo to pull from. Do you have a git repository to ask Linus to pull from, and to provide a branch for linux-next integration testing? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757014AbcAOJbT (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2016 04:31:19 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f194.google.com ([209.85.213.194]:32775 "EHLO mail-ig0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755703AbcAOJbO (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2016 04:31:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160115005229.GB238@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20160108043907.GA7005@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160108043959.GA7856@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160111175307.GC6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160113014046.GA22101@verge.net.au> <20160115005229.GB238@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:31:13 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FTn-sFa0tuyrlWeZgfulpKaaK3w Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state, with new maintainers From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Rich Felker , Yoshinori Sato Cc: Linux-sh list , Simon Horman , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , "D. Jeff Dionne" , Rob Landley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rich, Sato-san, On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:40:46AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:53:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote: >> > > From: Rich Felker >> > > >> > > Add Yoshinori Sato and Rich Felker as maintainers for arch/sh >> > > (SUPERH). >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Rich Felker >> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato >> > > Acked-by: D. Jeff Dionne >> > > Acked-by: Rob Landley >> > >> > A much appreciated move, >> > >> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) >> >> Likewise, >> >> Acked-by: Simon Horman Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > While patch 2/2 still seems to need discussion and resolution, I don't > think this part (1/2, adding us as maintainers) is controversial. Can > it be committed now? Geert? Andrew? I think it should go in either through Andrew, or through yourself, depending on whether you already have other stuff ready for this merge window, and have a git repo to pull from. Do you have a git repository to ask Linus to pull from, and to provide a branch for linux-next integration testing? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds