From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:11:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Rich Felker , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , Dominik Brodowski , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Deepa Dinamani , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux , linux-s390 , Davidlohr Bueso , y2038 Mailman List , Michael Ellerman , Helge Deller , the arch/x86 maintainers , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , Firoz Khan , Matt Turner , Fenghua Yu , Will Deacon Hi Arnd, On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > reason or another. > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > Is that intentional? > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > architectures, I can add that as well. Thanks, sounds fine to me. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C4CC43387 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6593B208E3 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730967AbfAJSLS (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:11:18 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-f65.google.com ([209.85.217.65]:39998 "EHLO mail-vs1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729882AbfAJSLP (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:11:15 -0500 Received: by mail-vs1-f65.google.com with SMTP id z3so7581343vsf.7; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:11:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EUuZ5Krtu82auHRun9veeZBKChDTVOpn44W3kwgqDtY=; b=MfgbvF4H1B08EEc4UW2D0OBgocum7r4ZszTCkwltQB2LGidZc5G4jpvxjjA06/IF5Z CKPyMOw3tG2Vkl/u0RFkqdFDfJawwmLb08c1PEW1Bydd12GrLp9hln7O/C5dxilRUz5y x6VQajubkooAXxtetItlv1b8p2WOV+7UyuqiEWC19ZgfIu6xT32ZLMs074CQlHRqRcyK G+nVwCNnZ6TSSRZRFxZb2WYyqiLum6NRPdttbf78HAZEP6BzDxqExUxmeqtrJR2/mM0b nX4z6cdwuuyxJIGkXPA1dnza9XHk0quJMvvc/AIWxArgsZf8dF/Xp5Vb8RECzn5/sn7G 4znQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcAZyY/29b3RKW6Xlzzg6rhdFJrtd4kJwZLWob/JH3kZPKfjA17 xrlcMpr7PlnsxT1o4iKcvvPjirKiHEn4neql4Us= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6aokmnpf1j0NX2Ej8BYTOm8/6RZGNDOHHw2gQ7ocUs2TauDUatTN8cLeSj84eryGhe6FE/dq+5R1mIXqFPJxk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c202:: with SMTP id i2mr4350248vsj.11.1547143873299; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:11:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:11:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: y2038 Mailman List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Michal Simek , Paul Burton , Helge Deller , Michael Ellerman , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Rich Felker , "David S. Miller" , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Max Filippov , Firoz Khan , "Eric W. Biederman" , Deepa Dinamani , Dominik Brodowski , Andrew Morton , Davidlohr Bueso , alpha , Linux ARM , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , linux-m68k , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Parisc List , linuxppc-dev , linux-s390 , Linux-sh list , sparclinux Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > reason or another. > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > Is that intentional? > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > architectures, I can add that as well. Thanks, sounds fine to me. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:11:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Rich Felker , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , Dominik Brodowski , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Deepa Dinamani , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux , linux-s390 , Davidlohr Bueso , y2038 Mailman List , Michael Ellerman , Helge Deller , the arch/x86 maintainers , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , Firoz Khan , Matt Turner , Fenghua Yu , Will Deacon List-ID: Hi Arnd, On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > reason or another. > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > Is that intentional? > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > architectures, I can add that as well. Thanks, sounds fine to me. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AFFC43387 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC9E02054F for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:12:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BC9E02054F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43bDcl2rNfzDqtp for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 05:12:55 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=209.85.217.66; helo=mail-vs1-f66.google.com; envelope-from=geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Received: from mail-vs1-f66.google.com (mail-vs1-f66.google.com [209.85.217.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43bDZq6JWqzDqv4 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 05:11:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-vs1-f66.google.com with SMTP id y27so7619446vsi.1 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:11:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EUuZ5Krtu82auHRun9veeZBKChDTVOpn44W3kwgqDtY=; b=gnXJeEua66axQ4bwHlghUkjGuSxRZNpI9MsiW9XgXsNwEHv0oXZJ//5BMfifP8S/uh yo4oVbaCWg8FKuJ4xJ8JnQoKC3YKSH6Bwj14kltGv2VLnlMn6Lc7jXreAyVw5FgXcSbI Ld/kO7yd5H61dkqOteQuV9wG0+y075vvyO/4qUbz+b8ePCOhkTvAcaTYBXstt4lJJpWG NBMa/w9skxPEpdamI/BW28QWaMofgb1skneIfURLhPfywPnjhqedpWHXO0Pbvtewlg+M r9r00DuaSFqW7uEQuxumg4q7YrLkj1XTMQqWq8weCxJvRz4CCxTRDYfrfoF3nfu/rsFY 6kug== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcevdgRznPkSAJedi6xtAl3vDJ/QQPWko5NcgR6dqYCQneJCE1W RJNOAWa8M+68u0o7wt8jl16cAH7+U9ooSdI1HiQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6aokmnpf1j0NX2Ej8BYTOm8/6RZGNDOHHw2gQ7ocUs2TauDUatTN8cLeSj84eryGhe6FE/dq+5R1mIXqFPJxk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c202:: with SMTP id i2mr4350248vsj.11.1547143873299; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:11:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:11:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 To: Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , Dominik Brodowski , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Deepa Dinamani , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux , linux-s390 , Davidlohr Bueso , y2038 Mailman List , Helge Deller , the arch/x86 maintainers , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , Firoz Khan , Matt Turner , Fenghua Yu , Will Deacon , linux-m68k , Ivan Kokshaysky , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM , Michal Simek , Tony Luck , Parisc List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Burton , "Eric W. Biederman" , alpha , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi Arnd, On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > reason or another. > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > Is that intentional? > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > architectures, I can add that as well. Thanks, sounds fine to me. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EF4C43387 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0AB8206B7 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="noDWO0h7" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A0AB8206B7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=sK3NJ2hwQqb9XnRW/GcGlcy9fylOXLbuM42/DTPEwfc=; b=noDWO0h7oPGb8d LOhreqLl+bO/QrKoZJfp2vxWQRFChp6pia68ZiRjkns8iFPCOW3KVhI22qq9LZlnM5V9jz0JQoRq/ tWq+bRIBA97V3FsT2xtezr/n8iUoTOABAbVXBCCZpMsf4XAmKNYqv8LpF+Il1+eyC9Gy4cMbRkmeX fsvEsmsbYJ20vyKuke4CItg5dQKzwA0+HNcowkPmeKDQEOrEzt20UIux9QNtHitLiufoqYqbt7VuG YsshYMyJ/KyBpLqXtXlcx3jYIPcsV0qGe7abad2Zy6JYbUtztRS92Hn7k/62LsPlM1JFJpvdZjyAZ 4/ETYjpNFgOD3AemwTpQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghenV-0000Ci-Gr; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:11:17 +0000 Received: from mail-vs1-f67.google.com ([209.85.217.67]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghenS-0000Bw-M6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:11:16 +0000 Received: by mail-vs1-f67.google.com with SMTP id y27so7619445vsi.1 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:11:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EUuZ5Krtu82auHRun9veeZBKChDTVOpn44W3kwgqDtY=; b=lIjH6PQRCJrK/Tj0Tao6aSKDnfsrlZ5Uyf/kcSOb9ZTVEbBTkBiGu8xGC8Gva4xDEK JvakLHN6J5dPljbt0oOkQJCwv3TiybvTV1ao9GXExQANQvE+fQBdgmyl+ysEn0/y6KDJ ChCr3msQ6cVTea+w2dSaN7zPUxmBRuT2RzsQZeCUcKcH1WGZ5NTlFu/iAPy2o/KrnclZ MMwVqBth/Nb8/gwPMGtKZ5LaUCclptV/feBIcgFwRJbjRVZEioDfZByjUS2odKqHZZmT knIjHssHEWvNgQx3ZdaoVVIPUPz8ZTl57mKUawb/jUdFGYE+FFfI9l6PDblzC0Ak99+B m43g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcqbrZa2pjNGcPSmh+mosAM9+xFRuJuVtoF3EC1RYzI2LJ9UbH7 62bw/+ScZt4XchsKdvrzYyzPITi7hzai2M4uM8Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6aokmnpf1j0NX2Ej8BYTOm8/6RZGNDOHHw2gQ7ocUs2TauDUatTN8cLeSj84eryGhe6FE/dq+5R1mIXqFPJxk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c202:: with SMTP id i2mr4350248vsj.11.1547143873299; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:11:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:11:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 To: Arnd Bergmann X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190110_101114_720879_CE1927BC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.54 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , Dominik Brodowski , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Deepa Dinamani , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux , linux-s390 , Davidlohr Bueso , y2038 Mailman List , Michael Ellerman , Helge Deller , the arch/x86 maintainers , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , Firoz Khan , Matt Turner , Fenghua Yu , Will Deacon , linux-m68k , Ivan Kokshaysky , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM , Michal Simek , Tony Luck , Parisc List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Burton , "Eric W. Biederman" , alpha , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Arnd, On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > reason or another. > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > Is that intentional? > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > architectures, I can add that as well. Thanks, sounds fine to me. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel